Forget about it and simply move on.

People tell me to move on as if this story ended decades ago. It didn’t. It is still active, still administrative, still written into records that continue to shape my life.

And that sounds great and magic and all, but that’s not how it works.

What happened in 1980 didn’t stay in 1980. It malingered from 1980 until it was revived in 2011, reinforced in 2018, and made permanent.

In 2011 the Canadian Forces National Investigation Service called me a “societal malcontent with an axe to grind against the military”.

I wasn’t someone who endured a year and a half of sexual abuse, from age seven to age eight, at the hands of a fourteen-year-old babysitter.

That was obviously just a story that I made up.

A lie that was told so that I could juice some easy money from the Canadian Armed Forces.

My father was interviewed by the CFNIS and claimed that he “never” hired a babysitter to look after my brother and me. And he was right. He never hired the babysitter, except for on one occasion. It was my grandmother that hired the babysitter every second weekend or so.

During our involvement with Alberta Social Service my father was noted as telling people that he perceived to be in a position of authority what they wanted to hear. My father was also found to tell conflicting stories from one interview to the next. And my father also claimed to be the victim, that everyone was attacking him, and that people were intentionally keeping information from him.

When I gave a copy of my Alberta Social Service paperwork to the CFNIS in September of 2011, did the CFNIS contact my father again to ask about the discrepancies between my Alberta Social Services records and his August 2011 statement?

Nope.

What he told the CFNIS in August of 2011 was more than enough to help the CFNIS shape the narrative of the story they wanted to ship to the Alberta Crown in October of 2011.

Growing up in Richard’s house on CFB Shearwater, CFB Summerside, CFB Namao, CFB Griesbach, and CFB Downsview was anything but pleasant.

On CFB Shearwater my mother made use of the “battered wives club” frequently. I was often “boarded” at the IWK Children’s Hospital due to instability and conflict in the household. My father was noted as being returned to port early due to “emotional issues” while at sea. And the doctors were beginning to put plans in place to put Child Protective Services in contact with my family just before we were posted to CFB Summerside.

When my father was posted to CFB Namao he asked his mother to come and raise my brother and I. Richard really didn’t like his mother. There was no closeness between the two. But without grandma there was no way that he’d be able to go on training exercises while leaving his 7 year old and 4 year old home alone for two or three weeks.

When my family became involved with Alberta Social Services in November of 1981, my father blamed the issues my brother and I were having on his mother. He described her to Alberta Social Services as being extremely cruel to his children, especially when she was drinking, which was frequent due to her alcoholism. He also said that she refused to seek treatment for her alcoholism. Now, this is rich coming from Richard and both he and grandma were alcoholics, and the two of them would often get stumble down drunk when they drank together. Sometimes they’d even trade blows if they got hammered enough.

When my father was asked by his buddy Jacques Choquette sometime around 1985, why Richard didn’t give us back to our mother to raise if he was getting sick and tired of us, Richard told Jacques that as long as we lived under his roof, he controlled the costs, and that if he sent us to live with that “bitch” that he would have to sign his whole fucking paycheque over to her and that wasn’t going to happen.

Around the spring of 1982, Richard called my brother and I into the living room of the PMQ on CFB Griesbach. Richard told us that he and Sue might be splitting up. Both Scott and I cheered as Sue was quite the asshole. She had gone from promising to get Richard’s drinking and temper under control to being just as angry as abusive as he was. It was almost like she had Stockholm syndrome and thought that if she punished us enough that Richard would be happy and approve of her. Richard told us to both shut up. He explained that if Sue left him, Scott and I were going into a duffel bag, buried where nobody would ever find us, and he would simply move back into the barracks.

This wasn’t a picturesque childhood.

This was a fucking horror show.

After the abuse on CFB Namao, I would frequently wet my bed.

Grandma would get angry and accuse me of attention-seeking.

My father was fine with me sleeping in the piss as he wasn’t going to waste his time on changing sheets.

Sue had decided that the best way to stop me from pissing the bed was to rub my face in it like a dog.

I actually stopped wetting the bed the day I moved out of the house just after my 16th birthday.

After Captain Terry Totzke declared me a homosexual because the abuse had gone on for so long, my father’s attitude toward me soured completely. He wanted sweet bugger fuck all to do with me.

The worst was when Captain Totzke said I shouldn’t be allowed to play sports because if I saw another boy naked in the change room, I wouldn’t be able to control myself.

A youth hockey team, the CFB Edmonton Squirts, posing on the ice rink in 1978-79. The team is dressed in white jerseys with blue stripes and red pants, holding hockey sticks, with a coach in a green jacket.
Me in hockey from 1978 – 1979
I’m the on directly in front of the coach
I didn’t finish the 1979 – 1980 season due to the events of 1980 hence no 1979 – 1980 picture
A young boy in hockey gear, including a white jersey with blue stripes and red shorts, stands on ice holding a hockey stick with a puck in front of him. He is wearing black skates with yellow stripes.
Me again in the 1978 – 1979 season
There were no 1980 pictures as I was yanked out of hockey
after the events of 1978 to 1980 came to light in the spring of 1980

No matter how clean I kept my nose, or how well I tried to do in school with absolutely no support from home, this wasn’t good enough.

My brother Scott was in and out of group homes and juvie while we lived on CFB Downsview, and Scott could do absolutely no wrong.

The difference?

Scott was a victim of the babysitter and me.

See, in 1980 Captain Totzke declared me to have a mental illness called homosexuality. My brother didn’t have that same illness apparently.

According to the Canadian Armed Forces, there were only two victims of child sexual abuse on Canadian Forces Base Namao. One person was the babysitter. The other person was my younger brother.

The funny thing is the babysitter went on to have a prolific career of molesting children. I ended up disgusted with sex believing that sex was only something that somebdy else made you do to them to make them feel good.

Because I allowed the babysitter to abuse Scott, Scott was no longer to blame for anything that he did. Me? Well, that’s a different story. Anything that Scott did was my fault because I let the babysitter touch him.

It was sometime around the summer of 1987 when my brother stole Sue’s Pontiac Acadian and took it for a joyride off the base and into the city. I was 15 he was 13. When Richard and Sue came home from shopping in Oshawa and Richard found the Acadian missing, he laid one fuck of a beating on me. As he’s wailing away demanding to know why I can’t look after my brother, why I’m not raising my brother, he blurts out that Scott wouldn’t be doing these things if I hadn’t let the fucking babysitter touch him.

By the time the fall of 1987 rolled around things were getting pretty tense in Richard’s houshold on CFB Downsview. Richard was his same old angry self. His drinking was picking up again. Sue had sent me over to the Sgt. & W.O. mess a few times to pick him up and bring him home. His insomnia was going off the rails. My bedroom had been moved into the basement a few months after Sue’s son William was born in August of 1985. Richard had his work area set up in the basement with his desk, his computers, and his television. He would frequenly come downstairs after midnight, turn his computers on, turn his TV on, spark up some smokes, and maybe have a night cap, or two, or three.

As I was young at the time, my hearing was top notch. I didn’t listen to loud music. Fuck, I didn’t even have a radio in my room, let alone a stereo that I could hook up headphones to. So when he turned his TV or computers on, the whine of the horizontal deflection circuitry would wake me up. Kids these days have it lucky with LCD and OLED monitors, but back in the day when I was kid TVs and monchrome computer monitors had a scan frequency of 15.734 kHz. And this was audible and annoying to any kid with decent ears.

When Richard discovered that his insomnia was waking me up every night and making it hard for me to sleep, especially considering that my room didn’t have a door, his solution was that I could get the fuck out of his house anytime that I wanted to.

I moved out in late 1987, just after I turned 16.

I had stopped going to school a few months earlier.

I was already paying Richard $150.00 a month in rent for my bedroom.

So when the company that I was working for found out the trouble that I was having at home, they set me up with a room to rent. It was only $50.00 more than what my father was charging.

Richard didn’t care. In facte he borrowed a pickup truck from one of his buddies and helped me to move.

I wish that I knew that my family had been under the supervison of the Children’s Aid Society of Toronto. I could hve applied for emergency aid which would have gotten me shelter and the ability to continue going to school.

But such was not the case.

Without school, I never had the opportunity to enter the trades. But then again, my father was adamant that he joined the RCN with grade 9 and that’s all anyone really needed to get a job.

So there was no trade school.

There was no college.

There was no university.

There was nothing.

And even if by some fluke I had been able to scrape the money to go to school, there was the untreated depression and severe anxiety that I had to deal with.

Remember, I wouldn’t find out that I had been diagnosed with major depression and severe anxiety until August of 2011 when I received my Alberta Social Services paperwork.

From literally October of 1980 when Captain Totzke sent me to see a psychiatrist until I received my paperwork in 2011, I had no fucking idea whatsoever that I had been diagnosed with major depression, severe anxiety, and haphephobia.

Growing up under Richard’s roof on Canadian Forces Base Griesbach, and Canadian Forces Base Downsview, both Richard and Sue treated my depression as me just be a lazy fucking asshole that didn’t want to do anything and who just whined about everything like a little bitch.

My anxiety was often treated by my father with a good backhand and an order to calm the fuck down.

My haphephobia wasn’t my fear of being touched. No, that was apparently me being to good to play with other kids.

So no, even if I had the money, the depression, the anxiety, and the haphephobia would have ruined everything.

Why didn’t you seek treatment?

Treatment for what?

Grinding my teeth all night long?

Sleeping in all the time?

Not wanting to get out of bed?

Not getting pleasure or joy out of anything?

Constantly wishing that I’d be dead?

No desire for sex as sex was a deviancy that only perverts and the mentally ill engaged in?

Trying to figure out whether it was worth continuing to exist at all?

No, see, my father had told me, I was just a lazy fucking crybaby.

I wasn’t depressed.

There was no depression in the Canadian Armed Forces.

Base brats had no fucking reason to be depressed.

So no, there was never going to be anything meaningful in my life.

Sure, I can do things.

But because I don’t have the qualifications on paper, I’m told I can’t officially do these things, even though I do them anyway.

I often find myself being attacked by people with certificates and Red Seals because I’m not supposed to know those things or work on those things. Doesn’t matter what my back ground is, or why I was prevented in life from getting the qualifications that they have.

I get yelled at by people with more qualification than I have because apparently I’m not teaching them what to do because I want to make them look bad. Yet they don’t seem to understand that they’re the ones getting paid a higher pay grade than I am because they’re supposed to be more qualified than me.

As I said, if I had gotten into the trades back in the late ’80s, and my depression and anxiety didn’t fuck things up, the absolute lack of support from home would have.

University? I don’t know of a single fucking university student that doesn’t receive assiatnce from home.

So no, there is no moving on.

There is no “getting over it”.

Every day of my existence is a reminder of what was taken away from me, because I live through it every day.

Every day is a reminder of how much of a joke my life actually is and how meaningless my life actually is considering how easily the Canadian Armed Forces decided that I was expendable not only in 1980, but again in 2011, and 2018.

No, there is no moving on from this.

This whole fucking mess is nothing but a fucking albatross around my neck slowly pulling me under the waves. And I am still expected to pretend it isn’t there.

Military Police Complaints Commission: Is it Effective?

For all of the bitching and complaining that the Military Police Complaints Commission does about the Canadian Forces Provost Marshal and the Canadian Forces National Investigation Service, you’d think that the MPCC would show a little interest in talking to the CFPM and the CFNIS about just how exactly the Provost Marshal and the Military Police avoid the pitfalls presented by the pre-1998 summary investigation flaw and the 3-year-time-bar-flaw.

When Bill C-25 ” An Act to Make Amendments to the National Defence Act” was passed in 1998, it removed the 3-year-time-bar from the National Defence Act and it removed the requirement for Commanding Officers to conduct Summary Investigation of the charges brought against their subordinates.

When the 3-year-time-bar was removed from the NDA in 1998, Bill C-25 said that current Criminal Code limitations, if any, would apply to service offence charges comprised of Criminal Code offences.

Bill C-25 also said that there was no longer a need for the review of charges by the commanding officer of the accused via a Summary Investigation. Going forward all charges would be referred to a Military Director of Prosecutions.

But what Bill C-25 didn’t concern itself with is what happened to service offences that occurred prior to the bill coming into effect.

Bill C-25 only applied to Service Offences after the date the Bill became law. Bill C-25 did not apply retroactively to service offences committed prior to 1998.

In the past, when I’ve asked the CFNIS and the Provost Marshal how they can bring forth charges for service offences when the 3-year-time-bar has obviously expired, all I get is a “trust me” response. I’m never directed to any Act of Parliament that allows for the retroactive removal of the 3-year-time-bar prior to 1998.

I for one can’t understand how any suspect charged in the modern day for any service offence that occurred prior to 1998 would give up the protection of the 3-year-time-bar.

The 3-year-time-bar is the case killer for any service offence that occurred prior to 1998.

Now, I know that there will be those that say that “Service Offence” are only military related.

That’s not true.

A service offence is not only related to charges of a military nature, but to all criminal code offences that are committed in relation to a defence establishment or defence material by a person subject to the Code of Service Discipline at the time of the offence.

And if the 3-year-time-bar didn’t kill off the prospect of charges, the requirement for a summary investigation after the laying of charges would.

In the post Bill C-25 era, how do the Canadian Armed Forces and the Judge Advocate General reconcile with the fact that the accused could enjoy the protections presented by his commanding officer in a Summary Investigation that was required by the National Defence Act after the laying of charges?

It was the commanding officer’s discretion as to whether the charges would be dismissed, or moved to a civilian court or a military court.

How can the Canadian Forces Military Police or the Canadian Forces National Investigation Service in the modern day go against the protections that a member of the Canadian Armed Forces enjoyed prior to 1998 under the law.

You can’t simply pass legislation and strip rights retroactively. There’s a reason for this. In 1984 when “Rape” was removed from the Criminal Code of Canada, the charge of Rape wasn’t retroactively removed as this would have exposed generations of husbands to potential charges of rape as under the definition of rape in the Criminal Code, a husband could never be charged with rape for having forced sexual intercourse with his wife against her wishes.

When Stephen Harper raised the Age of Consent from 14 to 16 in 2008, there’s a reason why this law didn’t apply retroactively.

If the law was made retroactively can you imagine the chaos in the courts if suddenly 18 year old boy friends were going to prison for having sexual intercourse with their 15 year old girl friend, or vice versa?

If the Government of Canada were to remove the retroactive protections afforded by the pre-1998 National Defence Act you can bet that this would create quite the constitutional crisis in this country as now the government could pass laws at will that retroactively criminalized behaviours or retroactively removed protections.

I sent a letter to the Military Police Complaints Commission asking them to look into how the modern day CFNIS was able to successfully lay charges for service offences that occurred prior to 1998.

Email correspondence regarding a request for clarification on jurisdiction and limitation periods under the Code of Service Discipline, including an attachment.

This is the response that I received from the MPCC:

A formal email response from the Military Police Complaints Commission of Canada, addressing a legal advice inquiry, with contact information for relevant departments.

I sent the following reply to their response.

Email correspondence regarding a request for clarification on jurisdiction and limitation periods under military service discipline, including an inquiry to a commission about the exercise of authority by military police.

And this was their final response:

Email correspondence from the Military Police Complaints Commission of Canada regarding a request for clarification on jurisdiction and limitation periods under the Code of Service Discipline.

The thing about the Military Police Complaints Commission that makes it very different from civilian police agencies is that you cannot make complaints against the CFNIS or any component of the Canadian Forces Military Police Group outside of conduct complaints related to the conduct of a specific person or persons during an investigation.

This is one of the ways that the Government of Canada compromised with the Canadian Armed Forces and got the Canadian Armed Forces to buy in to civilian oversight of their in-house police agency.

The military has its customs, and it sure as hell wasn’t going to allow some outside civilian agency to come in and tell the military police what they could or couldn’t do.

And Parliament, in draughting the rules for the MPCC, obviously never imagined the need for the MPCC to handle complaints from civilians about civilian related investigations undertaken by the CFNIS.

The rules of the MPCC favour members of the Canadian Armed Forces. If you’re a member of the public, you are shit out of luck, especially if you don’t have the funds available to hire an ex-JAG willing to go up against the Canadian Armed Forces.

And unlike members of the public, members of the Canadian Armed Forces can approach the Chief of Defence Staff with a grievance for redress that will override any finding of the Canadian Forces Provost Marshal or the Military Police Complaints Commission.

If I had to say what the number one flaw with the Military Police Complaints Commission is, it’s that during a conduct review the MPCC will not share with the complainant what the Canadian Forces Provost Marshal shared with the MPCC.

As I’ve said in other posts, the Canadian Forces Provost Marshal has the full authority under the National Defence Act to pull the wool over the eyes of the MPCC and there is nothing the MPCC can do.

The MPCC is full well aware that the CFPM more often than not hides paperwork from the MPCC and refuses to hand over documents.

In my matter, the CFNIS knew full well in March of 2011 of the connection between my babysitter and Canadian Armed Forces officer Captain Father Angus McRae.

The CFNIS already had the 1980 CFSIU investigation paperwork. The CFNIS also had the 1980 Courts Martial transcripts for the Courts Martial of Captain McRae. The CFNIS knew in March of 2011 from CFSIU DS-120-10-80 and from Courts Martial transcripts CM-62 that it was the investigation of my babysitter by the base military police in May of 1980 for the molestation of numerous children on the base that led to the investigation of Canadian Armed Forces Officer Captain Father Angus McRae.

The CFNIS in March of 2011 were very much well aware that the investigation of Captain McRae uncovered the fact that McRae and the babysitter hadn’t just molested a child or two. According to Mr. Cunningham in November of 2011, and the babysitter’s father in July of 2015, the CFSIU knew that Captain McRae and the babysitter were involved in molesting well over 25 children on the base from the years of 1978 to 1980.

In 2011 the CFNIS did a CPIC check on the babysitter.
The CFNIS would have discovered:
1982 – Convicted for molesting a young boy that lived off the base at CFB Petawawa.
1984 – Convicted for child molestation involving a child that lived off the base at CFB Winnipeg in Manitoba.
1985 – convicted for molesting a 9 year old boy on Canadian Forces Base Namao when his father had been posted back there. Also convicted for molesting a 13 year old newspaper boy after the Canadian Armed Forces ordered the babysitter to move out of the military housing.

The CFNIS, the Canadian Forces Provost Marshal, the Chief of Defence Staff, and the Minister of National Defence were well aware of the babysitter’s $4.3 million dollar civil action against the Minister of National Defence that was settled in December of 2008.

And yet, on November 4th, 2011, Petty Officer Steve Morris contacted me by telephone and told me that the CFNIS just couldn’t find any evidence to indicate that the babysitter was capable of committing the crimes that I had accused him of, even though I would find out in 2020 that the Courts Martial transcripts showed that the military police and the CFSIU knew that the babysitter was having forced anal intercourse with children much younger than he was and that he was receiving psychiatric care for his attraction to children even before he had been investigated by the base military police in May of 1980.


But, this is information that the Canadian Forces Provost Marshal willingly withheld from the Military Police Complaints Commission in 2012.

Doesn’t the CFPM worry that someone will discover what the CFPM did?

Nope. Why should they?

No agency has the authority to order the CFPM to hand over any documents. And to prove that the CFPM and the CFNIS don’t have “local copies” would be impossible.

But considering that the Captain McRae scandal has resulted in at least one successful lawsuit against the Minister of National Defence for the actions of Captain McRae, I wouldn’t put it past the military to have a folder or a CD-ROM / USB thumb drive / hidden network folder that contains instructions on how the CFNIS are to handle any complaints against Captain McRae or Captain McRae’s altar boys.

This way there’s no paper trail showing that the CFNIS signed out copies of the CFSIU DS-120-10-80 or the CM62 Courts Martial transcripts from the JAG library.

This is like when the Communications Officer for the Minister of National Defence asked for my correspondence to be given a non controversial name, encrypted, and hidden away in a “space saver file” ensuring that the contents were always beyond discovery and disclosure.

And when I filed my application for judicial review in 2013, when I discovered what the Canadian Forces Provost Marshal had done, it was too late.

This was the fatal flaw with my application for judicial review.

I relied extensively on “new evidence” which really wasn’t new evidence.

It was evidence that the Canadian Forces National Investigation Service had in their possession as it was information that I had shared with them, but it was evidence that the Canadian Forces Provost Marshal intentionally withheld from the Military Police Complaints Commission.

And during my dealings with the MPCC, the MPCC never once sat down with me and shared with me what the CFNIS had shared with them so that I could counteract what the CFNIS had claimed.

Instead MPCC investigators Peter and Claude both lectured me as to why the CFNIS had done one helluva bang-on investigation. Maybe Claude and Peter refused to accept my email conversations with the CFNIS investigators because they knew if these weren’t in the documents supplied to the MPCC by the CFPM they wouldn’t be able to do anything with them.

So…….. that leads to the question, “What is the purpose of the MPCC”?

The existence of the MPCC is just to satisfy a checkbox in Bill C-25. And that was the establishment of an outside civilian agency to oversee the military police. And that’s it. That’s why the Canadian Forces Provost Marshal has absolutely no issue with thumbing its nose at the MPCC as the CFPM knows there’s nothing of any real consequence that the MPCC can do.

During a review the MPCC cannot:
Subpoena documents
Subpoena witnesses
Administer Oaths
Re-run the investigation to see if the CFNIS should have come to a different conclusion.

All the MPCC can do is to look at what the CFNIS did.

Did the CFNIS take my complaint ?
Did the CFNIS investigate my complaint?
Did the CFNIS talk to witnesses?
Did the CFNIS submit a brief to the Crown?

So when an investigator claims that he flew out to Victoria to personally meet with me, it’s not the MPCC’s job to ascertain if this is true or not.

And even though the CFNIS investigator lied, he would have faced absolutely no consequences for lying.

When the CFNIS excludes all of my social service records that indicate that my father had brought his mother into the PMQ on base to raise my brother and I because our mother “abandoned us” and that he subsequently blamed his own mother for being cruel and abusive towards his children due to her alcoholism, the CFNIS never call him to explain his statement that his mother never lived with us and that he never hired a babysitter.

The fact he never hired a babysitter is correct, but that’s only because he was never at home.

Rent on the PMQ was cheap. Much cheaper than renting grandma a three bedroom apartment off base in the city. If it would have been cheaper for grandma to live off base, Richard would have sent us to live with her. And not only was it just cheaper for grandma, Scott, and I to live on base in the PMQs, but Richard could continue to claim us on his income taxes.

And more importantly, as we lived on base, Richard could use the Defence Establishment Trespass Regulations to ensure that our mother wasn’t able to come to see us. It wasn’t that our mother “abandoned” the family on CFB Summerside, Richard had the military police eject her from the military housing as she wanted a divorce if he was unwilling to get his rage and his drinking under control.

And at the end of the day, there is nothing that the MPCC can do to discipline the CFPM or any member of the Canadian Forces Military Police Group. If the CFPM wants to ignore the findings of the MPCC, the CFPM can tell the MPCC to go piss up a rope. Any recommendations that the MPCC offer are not enforceable through any legal mechanism.

Four people sleeping at a messy table with documents and a laptop, while a thought bubble above shows sheep jumping over a fence at night.

Why the fuck am I not surprised?

The one thing that I’ve learnt in life is that money corrupts as does power.

Now it turns out that lots of modern day “people of power” and “people of money” were cavorting with Jeffery Epstein on Pedo Island.

I guess it’s true that when you’re rich you don’t move in the same circles as the lesser people.

But at least we know through an accidental dump of un-redacted records by the DOJ just how many time certain people contacted Epstein or Maxwell and went to the island.

Screenshot of a social media post listing mentions from the Epstein files, including names like Trump, Bill Gates, and Elon Musk with corresponding numbers.

Yep, no drag queens or trans people were heading off to Pedo-Island, but looks like South Africa’s favourite Apartheid twins were hanging out there.

You think that maybe Trump’s war against Trans and Gays was just a distraction to keep eyes averted from the Epstein matter.

Everything stunk about this. Alexander Acosta the DA with the Southern Florida District entering into a plea deal with Epstein in 2008 that dropped all federal charges and only proceeded with much weaker Florida state charges. And who the hell were the people that benefitted from “Guaranteed immunity to unnamed “potential co-conspirators”

Unfortunately District Attorneys enjoy prosecutorial immunity, which means that Acosta doesn’t have to explain what he did, and will never face any consequences for what he did.

A provocative billboard featuring a satirical depiction of a man resembling Donald Trump sitting in a polluted landscape, holding a phone, wearing a crown and jewelry, surrounded by various objects including a car, a crocodile, and text referencing legislation.

Finally, even die hard MAGAs are starting to wake up to Trump and the whole Epstein matter.

Apologies……

A few people have recently contacted me and asked what it would take for me to ever consider not applying for Medical Assistance in Dying.

This is a very odd question.

Not because of the idea of trading apologies for giving up my desire to die.

But because of who those apologies would have to come from—and the fact that any such apologies would be absolutely meaningless.

Back in 2012, when I started looking for lawyers to help me deal with the matter that occurred on Canadian Forces Base Namao when I was a kid, one of the things I was repeatedly told was that using a lawsuit to seek an apology would be pointless. Any apology offered by anyone working for the CAF, the DND, or the federal Government of Canada would be meaningless. The government does not understand the concept of apologizing. It is a faceless, soulless organization that does not grasp the idea—or the weight—of a heartfelt apology.

A modern-day Chief of the Defence Staff could offer an apology, but it would still be meaningless. They would simply be following orders from the Minister of National Defence.

And besides, the Canadian Armed Forces have made its position very clear, it will not under any circumstance admit that things went off the rails in 1980.

Between 1978 and 1980, at least 25 children were sexually assaulted on Canadian Forces Base Namao by Captain Father Angus McRae, a member of the Regular Force. Captain McRae had already been investigated in 1974 for molesting children while posted to the Royal Military College in Kingston, Ontario. While there may not have been children enrolled at RMC itself, the college is directly adjacent to Canadian Forces Base Kingston. McRae was also suspected of having sexual involvement with a teenage boy at Canadian Forces Station Holberg on Vancouver Island immediately prior to his posting to CFB Namao in August 1978.

McRae was almost certainly moved to CFB Namao for two reasons. First, the military prison for Western Command was located at Canadian Forces Base Griesbach, and CFB Namao and CFB Griesbach together constituted CFB Edmonton. Second—and more significantly—the military police shack at Namao was positioned such that the Catholic chapel, and especially the rectory attached to it, were directly visible from the MP detachment.

The fact that McRae was investigated in 1974 for committing what were described at the time as “acts of homosexuality” at CFB Kingston and was not removed from the military demonstrates a clear failure by his commanding officer to act appropriately.

The fact that McRae was known to have engaged with a teenage boy at CFS Holberg and was again not expelled from the military shows another failure—this time by his commanding officer at Holberg.

Then there is the fact that McRae was able to molest more than 25 children on CFB Namao while operating in direct view of the military police detachment. During his defence, counsel from the Judge Advocate General’s office attempted to portray Warrant Officer Frederick R. Cunningham as having a personal grudge against McRae—one allegedly carried over to the CFSIU when Cunningham transferred there from base military police duties. Was this grudge real or imagined? And if it was real, was it born of anger at McRae for having deceived everyone? How many military police officers from CFB Namao owe apologies to the children who were abused because they failed to pay attention to what McRae was doing?

Colonel Daniel Munro, the Base Commander of CFB Namao, not only had the authority to determine the scope and breadth of the investigation into his subordinate, Captain McRae, but also the responsibility to decide which charges would proceed to tribunal and which would be dismissed.

Then there is Captain Totzke. Yes, he was likely “just following orders” when he acted as a roadblock that prevented me from receiving psychiatric care and therapy for the mental injuries I sustained at CFB Namao as a result of the sexual abuse that occurred from the fall of 1978 through the spring of 1980. But he had choices. He could have refused those orders. He could have gone against them. He could even have left the military in protest. Instead, he chose to be a good soldier.

Then there is my father. Once he learned what had happened, he could have left the Canadian Forces and entered civilian life to protect his children from military leadership. Instead, he too chose to be a good soldier—to keep quiet, not raise a fuss, and follow orders. He is dead now. There will be no apology from him.

Then there is the CFNIS in 2011. They were in possession of the 1980 CFSIU paperwork, yet they chose not to use its contents to advance the 2011 investigation. They clearly chose their military careers—and the protection of the infallible image of the Canadian Armed Forces—over the truth. They could offer apologies, but those apologies would also be meaningless.

A military officer addresses the media at a press conference, flanked by fellow officers in camouflage uniforms and military berets, discussing controversial orders related to a perpetrator.

The Provost Marshal could offer apologies for withholding the 1980 CFSIU paperwork from the MPCC in 2012, and for controlling the material released in order to steer the outcome of the MPCC review. But can anyone seriously place faith in an apology that means nothing? If the Canadian Armed Forces had any genuine interest in truth or honesty, the Provost Marshal would have ensured that all of the 2011 CFNIS materials were provided to the MPCC—not just carefully selected snippets designed to manufacture a narrative.

In 2014, I laid out exactly what had happened in Federal Court. Counsel for the Military Police Complaints Commission was fully aware of the MPCC’s limitations and the fact that the Provost Marshal could easily dictate the outcome of an MPCC investigation by controlling what information was disclosed—secure in the knowledge that the MPCC cannot subpoena documents or administer oaths. She knew exactly what the Provost Marshal and the CFNIS had done. Yet she chose her career within the Department of Justice over actual justice, and fought my application for judicial review not on the merits of my evidence, but on the basis that I was introducing evidence the Provost Marshal had deliberately withheld from the MPCC. She could have done the right thing. Instead, she chose the easy paycheque.

There are many apologies owed.

But none of them would mean anything.

Apologies have meaning when someone is apologizing for harm done without intention or malice and the apology isn’t seen as being forced.

When decisions are made deliberately—to hide, obstruct, and take the easy way out—apologies mean absolutely nothing at all.

And besides, it would not be fair for me to accept apologies on behalf of the other 25 children who were abused by Captain McRae and by his altar boy, who later went on to have a lengthy career molesting children on other Canadian Forces bases—now would it?

Batting 0 for 2

Recently I had filed two access to information requests with the Department of National Defence for copies of my psychiatric records that were kept by Captain Terry Totzke when I was under his care on Canadian Forces Base Griesbach from 1980 until 1983 as well as the records from when I attempted to enlist in the Canadian Armed Forces back in 1989 and 1991.

In 2011, I obtained my social services paperwork from Alberta Child and Family services. That’s how I discovered my direct connection to Canadian Armed Forces social worker, Captain Terry Totzke.

It wasn’t until I obtained my social services paperwork in 2011 and I discovered that the man I knew as “Terry” from back on CFB Griesbach was Captain Terry Totzke.

I 2011 filed an Access to Information Request with the DND to obtain a copy of whatever records Captain Totzke had complied in regard to my diagnosis and treatment. There was quite a bit of back and forth before DND finally responded that unless I could tell them what department the records resided in and who in that department had custody of those records, the DND wouldn’t be able to process my request.

A few weeks ago I filed another Access to Information request with the DND to try to obtain my records. This time however all I received from DND was a response which said that without my enlistment date, my discharge date, and the unit I was attached during the period of time that I was requesting my records for the DND would not be able to assist me.

I politely responded to response that I had specifically noted in my request that I was a military dependent, that I was not in the service and therefore was not attached to a unit and I had no enlistment or discharge date.

I’ve heard nothing back since.

I might have to involve the Office of the Information Commissioner of Canada.

The other request that I had filed was for the paperwork the DND and the CAF had created when I tried to enlist in 1989 and 1991.

When I tried to enlist in 1989, everything went fine. I did well on the battery of tests. My references were contacted. But then out of the blue the recruiting office called me and said that “something had turned up and that I was deemed ineligible for service”. When asked what this information was, the recruiting office wouldn’t say, just that my enlistment would violate CAF policy.

I knew that it wasn’t my grades in school as I was currently taking grades 9 and 10 together in the same year and I would be completed in the spring of 1990.

And it wasn’t unusual at the time for kids in grade 10 to fill in the paperwork and get all of the administrative stuff out of the way so that by the time they completed grade 10 they’d be ready to submit their final grades and then off to basic training they’d go.

The military at the time was keen to get the kids before they started eyeing up the trades or other well paying careers in the civilian world. The military loves brains that are malleable and mouldable.

I tried to enlist again in 1991 in Edmonton. At this point in time I had my grade 12 GED. This time I was told by the recruiting office staff that if I ever tried to enlist in the Canadian Armed Forces again that I would be arrested and charged for trying to fraudulently join the CAF. When I asked for an explanation I was told in a very curt tone that I had been told at the recruiting centre in Toronto that my admission into the Canadian Armed Forces would be a violation of policy. What policy this was I’ve never found out.

I was just recently informed by the information analyst that the result of this request is that apparently the DND and the CAF destroy recruitment information 3-years after it was created.

It must be remembered that Captain Totzke was convinced that I was a homosexual because I had allowed the abuse on CFB Namao to go on for so long without telling anyone. Totzke even went so far as to instruct me father that I should not participate in sports as there would be the chance that if I saw other naked boys in the change room that I wouldn’t be able to control myself.

And then there’s the whole matter of the Captain Father Angus McRae child sexual abuse scandal on Canadian Forces Base Namao not being investigated as “child sexual abuse” but instead being investigated as Captain McRae having committed “Acts of Homosexuality” on the base with young boys.

When I tried to enlist in the CAF back in 1989 and 1991 the CAF would have been well aware that I was a military dependent and that my father was in the Canadian Armed Forces. As my father was in the CAF his service file would have contained records of any involvement I would have had with military personnel, such as Captain Terry Totzke.

And if Captain Totzke’s records contained any of his concerns about the “homosexuality” that I had apparently exhibited on CFB Namao, this would have placed me in direct violation of Canadian Forces Administrative Order CFAO-19-20 in which the CAF declared that homosexuality was a mental illness and anyone who was suspected of being a homosexual was deemed to be ineligible for service.

However, all of these records conveniently no longer exist.

Much like how the Canadian Armed Forces spent so much time and money in the late ’80s removing the rectories from the base chapels as they obviously knew that there was a massive problem with the catholic priests on base, had the DND and the CAF been “cleaning up” and eliminating paperwork that could cause them embarrassment and humiliation, and subject them to civil actions?

Is this also why in the mid ’90s the DND and the CAF moved the management of the PMQs to an arms-length agency, and handed all of the schools on the various bases over to the local school boards to own and operate?

The clock is running down (YAY!)

Spent another day in bed power sleeping…… And tomorrow is looking much the same.

Sometimes the benefits of being an isolated loner are overlooked, such as being able to sleep uninterrupted for over 24 hours.

When I was a teen, when the depression was fresh and new, I used to be able to sleep for days on end.

Not having any reason to wake up helps a lot. And avoiding the pain and disappointment of the real world makes staying asleep in dreamland much preferable to the real world.

And shit’s getting real at work.

The new site is supposed to be in full operation by February 2027, so the new site is supposed to be handed over to my employer by June of 2026 which means that all sorts of new staff are showing up at my site.

It’s also officially noted that I will not be going to the new site. Which is a relief. I wasn’t too sure if mgmt. was truly understanding of my wishes. It looks like they are. I would have been extremely pissed off if mgmt. had tried to shoehorn me into the new site.

But Bobbie, didn’t you consult on the new site?

Sure did.

Doesn’t matter though, lots of people consulted during the months of planning meeting.

Big whoop.

Nope, my plans so far are to stay at the old site, which will somewhat be in operation until 2029-2030.

I’ll know for sure what my long term plans will be in March of 2027.

At this point I still don’t foresee wrapping up the Captain Father Angus McRae matter anytime soon. So I’m pretty well accepting that I will die before any resolution to this matter.

It sucks that I won’t get any type of acknowledgment for what I endured on Canadian Forces Base Namao or what I endured at the hands of Military Social Worker Captain Terry Totzke, but sometimes these fights aren’t worth it.

If I am approved for M.A.i.D. in 2027, then I will probably undergo the procedure in 2028.

If I’m not approved, then I’ll have to look into alternative methods.

In the meantime I still have enough shit to keep myself entertained at the old site.

Just smile and be happy

The worst offenders in the world for the “just smile and be happy” attitude are usually those that ought to know better such as psychiatrists and psychologists.

A picturesque fantasy landscape featuring four colorful unicorns by a sparkling stream, surrounded by vibrant flowers, with waterfalls in the background, a rainbow arching overhead, and a castle in the distance.

The problem that I have with psychiatrists and psychologists is that they occupy a position of authority that is rarely questioned and often poorly justified

In Most other fields of medicine, the cause of the problem can be easily determined, the matter can be dealt with, and the results of the treatment can be analyzed and quantified.

You feel depressed?

Have you tried not feeling depressed?

If you’re still feeling depressed then it’s your fault.

Here, have some meds.

How do they work?

We don’t know, but they seem to have something of a desirable effect, no?

What, you don’t like being numb or spaced out?

That’s okay, your depression isn’t bringing us down, so we feel better about ourselves.

A tense meeting in a clinical setting featuring three medical professionals in white coats, observing a man in a dark hoodie seated at a table. The professionals include a stern-looking older man, a focused woman taking notes, and a younger man with glasses. Glasses of water and paperwork are present on the table.
We’re the docs.
We will tell you how to feel.

And that’s what psychiatric treatments are all about. How to make the patient behave in such a way as to mask their issues so as to make society feel comfortable around them.

And holy hell, if you don’t match their preconceived ideas of what someone suffering from major depression should be presenting as, you get laughed out.

I got laughed right out of the emergency mental health program at Vancouver General Hospital. I went in for an “emergency” consultation one day after my family doctor recommended that I go there as they might be able to help.

Got interviewed.

You could see that once I brought up the issues that I was having with depression, how long that I had the depression, and what triggered the depression the doc was already writing me off as some sort of nutcase that was wasting his time.

Head shrinkers work in a realm of medication that is analogous to priests and the soul. Head shrinkers can claim to cure patients of mental illness while at the same time not actually being able to cure patients.

People ask why depression isn’t taken as seriously as other mental illnesses.
And the honest answer is uncomfortable, because it has nothing to do with severity.

Depression is ignored because it’s common.
Because it’s mostly invisible.
Because it’s hard to prove.
Because it unfolds slowly instead of spectacularly.
And because it’s deeply inconvenient to the way psychiatry is structured.

Those traits make it administratively boring and professionally threatening at the same time — even while it destroys lives.

Psychiatry, like most institutions, responds best to disruption. If someone has schizophrenia or acute bipolar disorder, the room knows it. Conversations stop. Social rules break. Emergency systems kick in. There’s a clear before and after. Something undeniable has happened, and the system is built to respond to that.

Depression doesn’t do that.

Depression shows up as exhaustion. Flatness. Withdrawal. People still show up to work. They still answer questions. They still know exactly what’s happening — sometimes more clearly than the people treating them. They function just enough to be ignored.

Clinically, depression doesn’t demand the floor. And institutions respond to disruption far more reliably than they respond to erosion.

There’s also something psychiatry almost never says out loud:
Depression threatens professional authority.

A depressed person is often not delusional. They’re coherent. Consistent. Sometimes uncomfortably accurate. They can name power imbalances, injustice, loss, futility — and they don’t get better just because someone with a title tells them to.

With schizophrenia, a clinician can say, “Your perception is disordered.”
With depression, the question becomes, “What if their perception is accurate — and the system is the problem?”

That’s destabilizing for a profession built on expertise, correction, and the assumption that insight flows one way.

Then there’s the systems reality. Depression is cheap. Chronic depression is unprofitable. Treatment-resistant depression is a bureaucratic dead end. There’s no biomarker. No scan. No test result that ends the conversation.

So the system falls back on what it can process: short questionnaires, medication trials, surface-level therapy, maintenance instead of resolution. Depression gets reframed as background noise — something to manage, not something to confront.

Modern psychiatry is optimized for stabilization, risk management, symptom reduction, and throughput. Depression often asks for things that don’t fit that model at all: meaning. Reckoning. Grief without a deadline. Acknowledgment of irreversible loss.

That kind of suffering doesn’t scale. It doesn’t fit productivity metrics. So it gets softened, minimized, or relabeled as “mild,” “situational,” “manageable,” or “just part of life” — none of which reflect the lived reality of severe depression.

Cultural bias leaks in too. Depression overlaps with states society already moralizes: sadness, fatigue, withdrawal, hopelessness. Even in clinical spaces, those reflexes creep back in — try harder, be grateful, stay positive, others have it worse.

Psychiatry didn’t fully uproot those attitudes. It absorbed them.

So depression becomes this strange middle category: serious enough to medicate, but not serious enough to really face.

And then there’s the darkest reason — the one that actually matters.

Depression forces clinicians and systems to confront something they desperately avoid: some suffering isn’t fixable. Not every life can be restored. Not every wound closes. Not everyone gets their future back.

Taking that seriously would require humility. Limits. Grief on the clinician’s side of the table.

So instead, depression is managed. Normalized. Quietly deprioritized. Not because it’s small — but because fully acknowledging it would force the system to change how it understands itself.

That’s the truth.

Depression isn’t brushed off because it’s minor.
It’s brushed off because it doesn’t validate authority, doesn’t resolve cleanly, doesn’t perform illness dramatically, and often tells the truth too clearly.

Another issue with depression is people who live with depression while estranged from their families are fighting a different battle than those who come from supportive homes — and it’s one that often goes unseen.

When family is absent or unsafe, there’s no built-in safety net. No one to notice gradual decline. No one to step in during crises. No one to help navigate appointments, paperwork, finances, or recovery itself. What others experience as “support” — a couch to sleep on, a ride, a meal, someone to advocate for them — simply doesn’t exist.

Depression in isolation also removes emotional legitimacy. People from functional families are often believed sooner, taken more seriously, and given more patience. Those who are estranged are more likely to be questioned, minimized, or quietly blamed — as if the absence of family support says something about their character rather than their history.

There’s also the exhaustion of self-containment. When you’re alone, every setback has to be handled internally. There’s no place to fall apart safely. No shared memory of who you were before things went wrong. Healing becomes not just about managing symptoms, but about surviving without witnesses.

These aren’t minor disadvantages. They’re structural barriers. And pretending everyone starts from the same place only deepens the gap between those who suffer with backup — and those who have to carry everything themselves.

As I’ve said before, it wasn’t that nobody knew that I was struggling with depression in the aftermather of the Captain Father Angus McRae sex scandal on Canadian Forces Base Namao.

What follows is not speculation, but based on contemporaneous records and correspondence from that period.

My father knew, Captain Terry Totzke knew. Fuck, the entire chain of command right up to base commander Colonel Dan Munro knew.

And from the evidence presented in my paperwork from back then, the goal of the Canadian Armed Forces was to minimize the risk of exposing the scandal that occured on CFB Namao to the general public.

And I feel safe in implicating the Canadian Armed Forces as a whole as Captain Totzke wasn’t following the orders of my father Master Corporal Gill, it was the other way around. And Captain Totzke, being bound by the NDA to obey the lawful commands of his superiors would have been following commands from higher up.

So, sacrifices had to be made.

And my mental health was one of those sacrifices.

Why?

why can’t society just accept the fact that some people just don’t want to live?

Society seems to believe that everyone should enjoy life, and that if they don’t enjoy life then the person wishing to die is the problem and they had better smarten up.

It’s almost as if society is so hellbent on doing everything it can to hide the defects in everyday life. It’s almost as if society knows that life is fucked, but if they have to suffer then everyone else is going to have to suffer.

My desire to die via Medical Assistance in Dying is not something that I’ve just developed since M.A.i.D. was first legalized in Canada in 2016. My desires to die have existed since the day the babysitter first slipped his hands down my pants when I was 7. And the desire was only amplified with every depraved act he did to me or forced me to do to him over the next 1-1/2 years.

Whether it’s a blessing or a curse, the memories of what happened in the rectory after the “sickly sweet grape juice” are very, very vague. I do remember on time having rectal bleeding after one visit. And I do remember getting a beating from my grandmother after another visit when the babysitter had brought me back home a little too intoxicated and my grandmother first accused me of getting into her booze, and then when she checked her booze and saw that it was all there, she accused me of getting into my father’s booze. Even though my father was away on training exercises, she said that it appeared that his booze hadn’t been touched. So she dragged me around the PMQ patch while interrogating all of the teenage kids to see if one of them gave me the booze.

The actions of Captain Totzke and my father in the aftermath of the CFB Namao child sexual abuse scandal really intensified my desires. And the desires have never gone away.

As I’ve said in other posts, I’ve never followed through with my desires simply due to the fact that I am terrified of fucking up the act and ending up as a brain damaged vegetable in a hospital having to endure 20 years of a feeding tube and nursing students wiping my ass.

That’s not a reason to live.

I’ve seen too many people trapped inside broken bodies, nope, not for me.

It’s not my job to undo the damage that the babysitter, Captain McRae, Captain Totzke, or my father bestowed upon me via sexual abuse, mental abuse, psychological neglect, or neglect in general.

It’s not my responsibility to take drugs for the rest of my life so that I become a compliant zombie.

It’s not my responsibility to go for therapy where I can learn how to hide my issues and mask my inner turmoil so that the rest of you can feel comfortable.

It’s not my job to pretend what happened didn’t happen and that it was my fault for getting “stuck in a rut”.

To compare what I went through with someone who lost their goldfish when they were 12, or who didn’t get the bicycle they wanted when they were 10 is absolutely insane.

Bobbie, all you do is talk about M.A.i.D., don’t you have anything else to talk about?

Simple answer, nope.

Why not?

The household that I grew up in wasn’t conducive to having interests in things.

But Bobbie, lots of people grow up in neglectful households.

True, but it wasn’t just the neglect.

It was the intergenerational trauma.

My grandmother’s bout in Indian residential school obviously fried her noodle. And she passed her anger, her hatred, and her alcoholism down to my father.

My father picked up his mother’s trauma, and he exhibited her anger, her hatred, and her alcoholism. But he also picked up something more. He was so bound and determined to prove to everyone that he wasn’t 1/2 Indian that he had to pretend that he was something that he wasn’t. He had to be someone so flawless and faultless that he couldn’t possibly be 1/2 Cree. This turned him into an absolute asshole.

My father brought his mother into the PMQ on CFB Summerside to raise my brother and I after he had our mother booted out of the PMQ. When she moved back to Edmonton in the spring of 1978 to be with her husband my father got a compassionate posting to CFB Namao in 1978 so that he could get grandma and her husband to come live with us on base while he went off on every training exercise he could sign up for.

He did this even though just a few years later he would tell Alberta Social Services that he blamed his mother’s cruelty towards his children as well as her alcoholism for the problems exhibited by his children.

And then he brought his girlfriend in to live with us in the summer of 1980.

Sue was okay at the start. As my brother said to Alberta Social Services in 1981, “when Sue first moved in she promised not to hit us, but she hits us all the time now”. There were two things that Sue promised to do when she moved in. She was going to stop our father’s drinking, and she was going to stop our father from hitting us.

There was a brief period of time when Sue and Grandma lived with us simultaneously in the PMQ on CFB Griesbach. Grandma was still pissed off at my father for booting our mother out of the house. Whenever my father would bring up how much of a “bitch” my mother was for running away my grandmother would always fire back that one day us kids would learn the truth.

Sue blamed my grandmother’s drinking for my father’s drinking. And Sue was 100% certain that grandma was trying to sabotage the relationship between our father and Sue.

And I guess that my father never told Sue about his kids being sexually abused for 1-1/2 years on CFB Namao. When the school for military dependents got Captain Totzke involved, you can sure bet that neither Totzke or my father told Sue about what had happened on CFB Namao. And let’s face it. In 1980 Sue would have been around 20 years old. My father was 34 years old.

From the limited history that I have been able to piece together my father met Sue via his paternal stepsisters that lived in Oshawa and went to the same high school as Sue.

I can see my father telling Sue that I was the reason our family was involved with the military social worker, and that it was my fault that our family was involved with Alberta Social Services.

So yeah, it wasn’t just that the house in which I lived was dysfunctional. It was that I had to endure the anger of adults who were misdirecting blame in my directions.

Captain Totzke blamed my apparent homosexuality for me having sex with the babysitter for over a 1-1/2.

My father blamed me for being a pervert and for allowing the babysitter to molest my younger brother.

Grandma? I think grandma was just pissed off at everyone.

And Sue? Sue was pissed off because the perfect little family that my father had promised her was obviously never going to be realized.

Neglect would have been one thing.

But what I had was (Neglect + verbal abuse + sexual abuse + physical abuse + mental abuse + psychological neglect + abandonment).

That’s my life.

.That’s all I’ve ever known.

There was never any encouragement for hobbies or interests.

Which is why I have no hobbies or interests.

Surely there must be something that you like, something that sparks an interest in.

Nope.

You’re just not trying hard enough.

Nope.

You’re being melodramatic.

Nope.

What about sports?

Nope.

Photography?

Why, so everyone can tell me how much my pictures suck. It’s always so funny how taking pictures isn’t just about taking pictures. Nope, you’re supposed to criticize and chastise people for the wrong film speed and shutter speed and aperture setting. Oh, and gotta ridicule people for choosing the wrong lens for the task even though the person likes the effect created by the “wrong” lens.

Fashion?

Fuck no.

Music.

Nope.

Films?

Nope.

Theatre?

Nope.

Concerts?

Nope.

Travel?

The fuck for? I can be as depressed at home without having to spend a metric shit ton of money to go some place else and be depressed.

Electronics?

Fuck, I hate electronics. I have my self taught skills, but I get ass raped at work for not “teaching” others how to be as smart as I am. I have no degrees in electronics or building automation, but fuck do I ever get ragged on for not giving everyone else the skills it’s taken me a lifetime to accumulate.

Computers? Again, fuck no. Computers are a tool that I use. They are not a toy, or a source of pride, or enjoyment for me. It drives me fucking bonkers that people who should run circles around me with their degrees or diplomas can’t even do the basics. I used to ask new applicants if they had computer skills with Word, or Excel, or Open Office, or if they’ve ever used a PDF editing program like Adobe Acrobat or Nitro PDF to put together a PDF from single pages, or to create a fillable PDF file. Yep, sure, of course! Without exception it turns out that they can’t but their computer module they took as part of their diploma program or certificate program taught them how to create a blank Excel sheet and to give it a cute name.

Why don’t you get involved in community activities.

Massive fuck no! Society has done a very good job of telling me to fuck off and to leave them alone, so I’m happy to leave society the fuck alone.

“What’s your mission?”

Daily writing prompt
What is your mission?

I don’t know if I have a mission or not.

My battle with the Department of National Defence and the Canadian Armed Forces is not a “mission”. It’s just that what happened in from 1978 until 1980, both abuse wise and military justice wise greatly fucked with my life. My “mission” in this regard is simply to clear my name, and then die.

My mission at work? My mission at work is to do my work in trade for a paycheque. That’s it. I’m just a fourth class power engineer in charge of a 5th class heating hot water plant and 5 MW of chiller capacity. By HR decree I am not qualified to work on the building automation systems, but I still do, otherwise nothing would get done. But I am not allowed to take credit for any of this as I am not qualified.

Other than that I don’t have anything that would pass for a mission.