I don’t really have that much to say.
Actually I do, but it would just be the same regurgitated shit that I’ve talked about so many times before. I’ve talked about this so many times before even I’m getting numb about it.
569 days to go until I am able to apply for M.A.i.D., and again that depends entirely on the government of Canada not chickening out at the last minute like they did in 2023 and 2024.
One thing that I have always wondered about is what Peter Cicalo and Claude Bergeron would have to say. I’d love to hear from those two. Peter and Claude were the two investigators with the Military Police Complaints Commission that I was interviewed by in 2012. They were former police officers.
They were impressed with the amount of effort and the expertise that the investigators with the Canadian Forces National Investigation Service put into investigating my complaint against my babysitter from Canadian Forces Base Namao.
Seeing as how the Canadian Forces National Investigation Service had both the 1980 CFSIU DS 120-10-80 investigation paperwork as well as the the 1980 courts martial transcripts in their possession since the start of the 2011 investigation, how could Peter and Claude have missed this?
Did Peter and Claude not read through these documents?
Did Peter and Claude just brush these documents off as unimportant?
I’m just trying to figure out how Peter and Claude overlooked the contents of this paperwork.
Maybe due to the limited powers that the MPCC has Peter and Claude weren’t made aware of this paperwork.
But they’re investigators. Isn’t it their job to investigate? When things don’t add up properly, shouldn’t someone stick their nose in a little deeper?
The CFNIS said that they couldn’t find any evidence that the babysitter was capable of the crimes I accused him of, yet the babysitter’s CPIC file shows that he was arrested, charged, and convicted of sexual assaults against young children in 1982, 1984, and 1985 and that these charges were always in the vicinity of the bases that the babysitter’s father was posted to.
1982 was CFB Petawawa
1984 was CFB Winnipeg
1985 was CFB Namao, again.
Sure, these convictions don’t prove the babysitter did anything to me or my brother. But as the old adage goes, “where there’s smoke, there’s fire”.
Okay, fine, let’s say that the CFNIS withheld the babysitter’s CPIC file and CFSIU DS 120-10-80 and 1980 CM62 from Peter and Claude, surely the contents of my social service paperwork when compared to my father’s statement to the CFNIS would have piqued some interest.
In 2011 when interviewed by the CFNIS my father claimed that he knew of no babysitter, that his mother never looked after my brother and I, and other odd issues. But in my social service paperwork that I provided to the CFNIS just after I received it in August of 2011 my father tells Alberta Social Services that his mother had been looking after Scott and I since our mother abandoned him. He blamed his mother, my grandmother, for the issues that Scott and I were having due to the fact that “she was extremely cruel to his children, especially when intoxicated, which was frequently”. I can see why the CFNIS wouldn’t want to interview my father again to clarify his statement. But why didn’t Peter and Claude pick up on these discrepancies?
I wonder what Peter and Claude thought when they saw the newspaper coverage announcing the original release of CFSIU DS 120-10-80 and CM62 and which indicated that the whole sordid affair of Captain Father Angus McRae was only exposed because the numerous parents on the base had complained to the military police about the actions of my babysitter molesting numerous children on the base.
I wonder what Peter and Claude think of my class action.
Do you think that they’re cheering for me, or do you think that they hope that my matter fails so that my case just fades into the annals of history.
Why did my father lie to the CFNIS in 2011.
Probably for the same reason that Fredrick Cunningham shut his mouth after first telling me everything in November of 2011. Fear of repercussions from the DND and the CAF.
I’ve got a couple of theories.
He was a piss tank alcoholic with anger issues. His formal education level was fairly low. He wasn’t anything special in the military, just another troubled member with a dysfunctional family in tow. There were times that he would come home completely rattled and muttering over and over that “this was it”, and “he was going to get booted out now”, and that if he got booted that he was going to have to go work on cars in a garage or work at a gas station.
From late fall 1978 until spring of 1980 his kids both get molested by the base chaplain and the chaplain’s altar boy. In the spring of 1980, the same spring that 8 year old me is found being fucked in the ass by the 14 year old babysitter, my father is a Master Corporal. By around 1988 my father is a Warrant Officer.
I’ve often wondered if Richard promised our silence in trade for kind from the Canadian Forces. Maybe that’s why he lied about CFB Namao.
Maybe he didn’t want to admit that he wasn’t living with us in the PMQ on CFB Namao and that he had left us in the care of his mother. A woman that he described as “being cruel” to his children when she was drunk. Which according to Richard was frequently due to her being an alcoholic that refused to seek treatment for her drinking.
He’s dead and gone.
The babysitter is still the innocent little angle who did absolutely nothing wrong.
I’m the horrible homosexual that forced the babysitter to molest his younger brother.
March 17th, 2027 just can’t come fast enough.
Beeshive 