Basically I have to string two private networks together across the hospital IP network.
Using the MOXA NAT-102 is easy to set up to accomplish this.
Once done the two NATs will only be able to talk to each other. No other device on the hospital network will be able to talk to these devices and these devices won’t be able to talk to anything else on the hospital network.
Elevator B11 and the elevator monitoring system will be completely isolated from the hospital network in the sense that both are “private” networks that can only communicate with each other with the NATs functioning as the intermediaries.
It was either do it this way or spend about $7k to run wiring from elevator B11 machine room about 200 metres over to the engineer’s office.
Good thing that I’m not qualified to do this, otherwise if I was qualified to do this then I’d realize how out of my league I am and I’d have to stop.
In 2011, after having talked to a few ex-JAG legal officers who were now practising private law, on their advice I contacted the RCMP to have my investigation removed from the CFNIS and handled by the RCMP. This was based on the fact that what I had initially reported to the Edmonton Police service before the EPS handed the case to the CFNIS was child-on-child sexual abuse. Definitely nowhere near the realm of a service offence.
I found out by talking to the local RCMP out here that civilian offences committed on Canadian Forces Base Namao were the jurisdiction of the RCMP Morinville detachment.
I called the Morinville RCMP detachment and I spoke with a Corporal F.
Corporal F. took my information and said that he would get back to me after he looked into this.
He called me a few days later and said that my matter belonged solely to the CFNIS and that the CFNIS would call the RCMP if they needed help.
After PO Steve Morris had called me on November 4th to tell me that the “CFNIS couldn’t find anything to indicate that the babysitter was capable of what I had accused him of” I made my plea on Facebook in the various base brat groups for contact information for anyone who knew anything about the Captain Father Angus McRae child sexual abuse scandal. This is how I was put in contact with retired Warrant Officer Fredrick R. Cunningham, who as it turned out was the Acting Section Commander of the Canadian Forces Special Investigations Unit in 1980 and had been personally charged by base security officer Captain David Pilling with investigating Captain McRae for having committed “acts of homosexuality” with young boys on the base.
When I spoke with Fred he made it very clear that the military police AND the chain of command were aware that the babysitter had been molesting children and this is what led the military to discovering the actions of Captain McRae. Cunningham also said that it was “the brass” that dropped all of the charges against McRae and only allowed the charges related to the babysitter to go to court martial. Cunningham had said that in 1980 the military police tried to bring in the RCMP to deal with the babysitter but that “the brass” would not allow this.
As I had no idea of who Fred Cunningham really was or what his relationship to the military was in 1980 I sent an FOI to the RCMP looking to see if my name had been mentioned in relation to any investigation of the babysitter that may have occurred in 1980.
I was fucking furious when I received the reply to my request.
It had nothing to say about 1980.
It instead was a copy of the incident report generated by Corporal F. of the Morinville detachment.
“Active sexual assault file going with Bees for the past six months”
Didn’t realize that there were six months between July 28th, 2011 and March 28th, 2011.
“Member sent an e-mail to the rest of the detachment members advising them of this file and Bees’ attempts to further his agenda”
What a fucking asshole.
Didn’t realize that wanting justice was “an agenda”.
Makes me sound like a crazed nut like the unabomber…..
Anyways, when I saw this I filed a conduct complaint with the RCMP.
Corporal Robb was assigned to this matter.
Corporal Robb was great. He listened to what my concerns were. He did his research and concluded that no, the CFNIS should not have taken this case from the EPS but should have directed the EPS to contact the RCMP as the RCMP has always had jurisdiction for civilian on civilian matters on defence establishments but that now that the CFNIS had the matter there was little the RCMP could do to take the matter away from the CFNIS.
But he also said that based upon the information that I gave him about the babysitter which was corroborated by the August 1985 Edmonton Journal newspaper article naming the babysitter that there was no way that the CFNIS should have ever concluded that there was no evidence to indicate that the babysitter was capable of what I accused him of. Corporal Robb wouldn’t give me the details, just the years.
Mr Bees, your babysitter was arrested and convicted in: 1982, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1989, 1990, with many more charges being stayed or dismissed. And the majority of these offences involved children.
These dates would later be confirmed by the Military Police Complaints Commission in 2013 and 2019.
I had also asked Mr. Robb to do me a favour and tell me if there was any reason for me to be afraid to cross the border. I explained to him that I knew my brother had used my name when he had been arrested when we were younger, and I didn’t want any surprises at the border. He said that nothing came back.
The complaint against Corporal F. was concluded shortly after that. I think that Sheldon had a talk with F. and F. realized that the CFNIS was being far less than truthful. I can only hope that Sheldon made it clear to Corporal F. that it was the CFNIS that had the agenda and not I.
Fast forward to 2017.
After having become aware that my father had kidnapped my brother and I when we were kids I approached the RCMP to file a complaint.
I attended the RCMP detachment in North Vancouver and I had brought copies of my ATIs from the PEI Govt., my Alberta Social Services reports, my Children’s Aid Society of Toronto reports, the Defence Establishment Trespass Regs. and a report commissioned by the Canadian Armed Forces that looked at spousal abuse in the military community, as well as my mother’s statements to me.
The intake officer couldn’t have cared any less.
Maybe your father and mother reached an agreement.
Maybe your mother just ran off like your father said.
My father had always told me when I was young that my mother was a whore that would spread her legs for anyone and that she ran off with a guy named Gus from the PPCLI.
All I remember about when my mother left my father was away with the airforce so she packed up our suitcases and dropped my brother and I off with another family in the military housing. Then she was gone.
This was the first time that our grandmother came from Alberta to live with us. She lived with us from just after my mother leaving until the late spring of 1978 when she moved back to Edmonton.
And that’s the story that I lived with until around 2013 when a woman named Pat Longmore contacted me after having read my blog. The first thing she asked was if I was “Rick and Marie’s” kid. I said that I was. She explained that she knew my father and my mother and that we were frequent guests at her PMQ whenever my father would start drinking. She said that Marie would show up with fat lips or bruises and that I would sometimes be sporting bruises.
I mentioned to her that in 1985, after my father lost his temper in the PMQ on Canadian Forces Base Downsview that Bill Parker had intercepted me and that he told me that if I needed a place to stay while my father cooled down in the future that my brother and I were welcome to come stay at his house, just like we used to on CFB Shearwater.
Pat said that yes, that both Pat and Nancy along with a few of the other women on CFB Shearwater ran the “battered wives club” and that they would arrange safe housing for military wives either at another PMQ or a safe house off the base. She explained that Dartmouth Social Services and Halifax Social Services were often very reluctant to get involved with military families due to jurisdictional issues.
I had also made contact with the PEI government that confirmed that my father had filed an application for child custody, but that it appears that he abandoned it as it never went anywhere in the courts and there was no other paperwork than the original application.
Based on what Pat had told me, along with what I learnt by reading the University of Manitoba report on The Canadian Forces Response to Spousal Abuse I decided to contact my mother. The only thing was I hadn’t spoken to her since 1992 and I had absolutely no idea as to where she lived.
I called her in October of 2013 and we had a long talk. Nothing that would repair the relationship, but long enough to get the details.
No, there was no “Gus”.
Richard’s drinking had gotten right out of hand. It started getting bad on CFB Shearwater after Scott’s birth. The posting to CFB Summerside wasn’t so much that Richard wanted this, it was that he had pretty well burnt all of his bridges at the Sea King squadron.
Things got really bad on CFB Summerside as Uncle Al, Marie’s brother, was nowhere near. Al and Richard had joined the Royal Canadian Navy in 1963 and went through basic training at Cornwallis together. It was through this friendship that Richard met Al’s sister, Marie. Al and Richard served in the navy together until Richard remustered into the airforce after unification in 1968. But Al still lived in Shannon Park, which was military housing for CFB Shearwater. So Richard knew he could only beat Marie so much before Al would come throttle him.
On CFB Summerside there was no Al to temper the beating, and things got out of control super fast.
Richard was posted to CFB Summerside in the summer of 1976. He was attached to 415 Squadron at Summerside which was the Argus squadron.
She said that Richard’s drinking got out of hand, and after the drinking got out of hand his rage wasn’t that far behind and as she knew no one on the island she didn’t really have anywhere to turn.
Even though we didn’t live on base, we lived in the city of Summerside in the Hillcrest Housing development. The Hillcrest housing development was built to Canadian Forces specifications and was on long term lease to the Department of National Defence and as such was subject to the National Defence Act, the Defence Establishment Trespass regulations, and military housing regulations.
All three of those regulations meant that spouses and children were living in those houses at the sole discretion of the serving member, and if the serving member didn’t want their spouse there anymore, then they weren’t there anymore.
When I spoke to my mother in 2013 she claimed that she told Richard that she was returning to Nova Scotia and that she was going to take my brother and I over to Al’s place and we were going to stay there until Richard solved his problems.
Days after this she said that the military police from CFB Summerside showed up and told her that if she tried to leave the island with my brother and I that the military police from CFB Shearwater would be waiting for her on the mainland and that she’d be arrested for child kidnapping and endangerment.
Marie said that a few days after this that someone from the office of the Judge Advocate General showed up and ordered her out of the PMQ by a specific date.
So, she did as she was told, and she left.
Now, I didn’t know what to believe. I knew that when we lived in Toronto just after we fled the jurisdiction of Alberta we were living in the LDHs just off of Canadian Forces Base Downsview. I had always been under the impression that these were welfare houses that were rented to the military. And I had assumed that the house where we lived in the city of Summerside was also the same situation.
A quick email to the Hillcrest Housing Development cleared things up. Yes, from the time these houses had been built until CFB Summerside shutdown in the ’90s, the entire development was on long term lease to DND and thus DND had legal jurisdiction.
But still, could the military just tell my mother to get out?
Sure they could.
Somebody in one of the base brat groups told me to look up the report co-authored by the University of Manitoba and the University of New Brunswick that was commissioned by the Canadian Armed Forces in 1996 and accepted by the Canadian Armed Forces in May of 2001.
The authors of the report noted that they had become aware of numerous instances of service members using the military police and the housing regulations to get rid of spouses once the marriages broke down and they decided they wanted to move on.
The report even noted that when divorces went to court and the court ordered that the non serving spouse was to retain the rental of the PMQ and that the service member was to move out that the DND and the CAF would outright ignore these orders citing that the housing was military property and could only by order or parliament be rented to service members of the Canadian Armed Forces.
And once booted out of the housing and off the base the non-serving spouse or their lawyers dare not tread uninvited on defence establishment property.
Marie also told me that Richard didn’t agree to the divorce until 1985 until she agreed to not go after property that she and Richard had co-owned in Nova Scotia. This was almost 8 years after he had her booted off base.
Richard could have gone to court at any point in time after she had “abandoned” him and ran off with “Gus from the PPCLI”. But he didn’t. In fact he even married his girlfriend Sue in 1982 in a private ceremony in our PMQ on CFB Griesbach in Edmonton.
What does this have to do with the North Vancouver RCMP?
What Richard did in 1977 met the legal definition of kidnapping.
Not only did he deny my mother legal access to my brother and I, he also moved my brother and I to a different province without our mother’s permission.
When I dealt with the intake officer at the North Vancouver RCMP detachment he just couldn’t give the slightest fuck ever.
Maybe your mother did run off?
Maybe your mother wasn’t capable of looking after kids, lots of women are like that, they’re not cut out for motherhood.
Maybe your mother and your father reached an arrangement instead of going to court?
So far my dealings with police have been less than spectacular.
Each and every investigator with the CFNIS was a compromised liar. The only exception to this rule would have been Sgt. Tenaschuk, but even Tenaschuk was limited by his chain of command.
With the RCMP only Corporal Sheldon Robb and Inspector Akrum Ghadbhan are what I would call respectable officers. Definitely a minority within the RCMP. Every other officer that I dealt with couldn’t care less or was willing to take the lies of another police agency as the gospel truth.
******************************
And beside, it’s not like the police are obligated to solve historical crimes.
Not a statutory one — not in the way people assume.
There’s no general legal duty in Canada that forces police to investigate a crime just because it occurred. The decision to investigate (or not) is almost entirely discretionary, resting on internal policy, available resources, and prosecutorial viability.
But there are nuances worth knowing:
1. Legal foundation: discretionary authority
Under Canadian common law and provincial Police Acts, police are empowered to investigate offences, but not compelled to investigate every allegation.
The Supreme Court in R. v. Beaudry (2007 SCC 5) recognized police discretion as essential — officers can decide whether, how, and to what extent to investigate or lay charges. That discretion must be exercised in good faith and without discrimination, but it’s still discretionary.
So, if a suspect is long dead or incapacitated, or the events are decades old, police can lawfully decline to investigate on the grounds that:
there’s no current public safety threat, resources are better spent elsewhere, or evidence or witnesses are too degraded to sustain prosecution.
2. Limitations periods and exceptions
For indictable offences (murder, sexual assault, kidnapping, etc.), there is no statute of limitations. Police may investigate and Crown may prosecute no matter how old. For summary offences (minor assaults, trespass, mischief, etc.), the limitation is 12 months from the offence — after that, even if police investigate, it’s unenforceable.
So a police service can investigate a historical crime, but once prosecution is barred or impossible, they’re not legally obligated to expend resources doing so.
3. When they do investigate historical crimes
They often do when:
The offence is serious (especially sexual violence or murder). There’s public or political interest (e.g., residential school abuses, clergy sexual assaults, police misconduct). There’s institutional liability at stake — for example, if a government body or religious organization could face lawsuits. There’s symbolic or restorative justice value. These cases are sometimes handled by “historical crime units,” not because of legal compulsion, but moral or reputational pressure.
4. When they usually won’t
If the offender is deceased and:
no living accomplices remain, no systemic failure is being alleged, and no charges could ever proceed — then police typically close or decline the file.
At most, they might document the complaint in an internal occurrence report so the record exists for posterity.
5. Case study: historical abuse investigations
You can see the principle in how RCMP and provincial forces handled church, residential school, or military child-abuse cases.
They only re-opened decades-old files once public commissions, lawsuits, or media pressure forced their hand. Even then, the justification was framed as “public confidence in the administration of justice,” not a direct legal duty to the victims.
6. Bottom line
In law:
Duty to investigate: no. Power to investigate: yes, anytime. Expectation of investigation: only when public safety, political, or institutional interests align.
The moral logic — that justice is still owed even if danger has passed — doesn’t bind them legally. It’s a choice.
If you want, I can show you the RCMP Operations Manual and provincial policies that spell out exactly how “historical offences” are triaged or declined — they’re pretty explicit about thresholds. Want that?
Here’s how it’s spelled out once you leave the rhetoric behind and read the manuals.
1. RCMP Operations Manual – “Historical Offences” (available under Operational Policy 2.5 and 2.7)
The RCMP uses the term “historical” to mean offences where a substantial amount of time has elapsed between the incident and the complaint.
Key points from their internal guidance (paraphrased from open versions and ATIP-released excerpts):
Members must assess whether an offence can still be prosecuted under the Criminal Code’s limitation rules. If the offence is indictable and a complainant is credible, a file may be opened regardless of age. The decision to proceed is based on “public interest, solvability, and resource impact.” Commanders may decline to assign an investigator if the suspect is deceased, the events are too old to substantiate, or “the public interest in prosecution is minimal.” Historical sexual offences are the main exception; they are “to be given investigative priority when feasible,” especially if there may be additional victims or institutional involvement.
So—no compulsion, just guided discretion.
2. Provincial examples
Ontario (OPP and municipal services under the Police Services Act)
The OPP’s Criminal Investigation Management Manual states: “The purpose of investigating historical criminal allegations is to determine whether the public interest is best served by continuing investigative steps, given the passage of time, availability of witnesses, and offender status.” Translation: it’s optional when the suspect is dead or the case offers no public-interest return.
Alberta and B.C.
Both provinces’ police standards mirror the RCMP’s criteria. B.C.’s Major Crime Section Manual notes that “files may be retained for documentation only when no viable suspect exists or the offender is deceased.” B.C.’s Independent Investigations Office (IIO) also clarified that its jurisdiction ends when there’s no living officer or suspect to hold accountable, even if the historical event is proven.
3. Where the “public interest” test comes in
Crown prosecutors and police both use that phrase, but it’s elastic. They weigh:
gravity of offence, likelihood of conviction, deterrence or restorative value, impact on victims and witnesses, cost and time.
If there’s no deterrent or institutional value — for instance, one abuser long dead, no systemic implications — it fails the test.
4. Why they sometimes reopen anyway
Occasionally a historical case reopens not because the offender’s alive, but because the institution failed (church, military, government). That transforms it from a dead-offender file into an accountability file. That’s how many residential-school, military, and clergy cases resurfaced.
5. The unspoken line
If a crime’s old, the suspect’s gone, and the victims lack political leverage, the police have every legal right to walk away. They might record a note for future researchers or coroner’s work, but the active pursuit is discretionary.
The law treats justice as optional past a certain point. Only shame, media, or inquiry tends to resurrect it.
One thing that depression has always screwed with is my ability to do mundane things like dishes.
When I rented my first apartment back in 1990 my dishes would often pile up and it would take quite the effort to get at them.
And it was always the same over the years.
The worst times would be when I would fill the sink up with water and soap and then just not get around to washing the dishes and I’d come back a few days later with bowls and glasses full of scum and mould.
Needless to say I migrated over to ready to eat meals from Safeway or IGA. Nuke the shit and then throw the remnants out.
Years ago I even went a step further and I got rid of all of my dishes. Now all I have is disposable cutlery, disposable paper plates, and occasionally disposable bowls.
I have a little Nespresso machine for making coffee. This thing is the ultimate machine for a person with depression that just can’t be bothered to really give a fuck. Buy the pods, use the pods, put the pods in a recycling bag, take pods back to store.
I still eat ready-to-eat meals from Safeway or IGA. Sure, I could probably save money making my own sandwiches at home instead of buying them pre-made at the store, but I would lose interest so fast that the food would turn into penicillin in the fridge. It might even evolve and gain sentience.
Besides, I never really learnt to cook as a kid. And I have even less interest in cooking as an adult.
As I’ve said before, depression and anxiety are a massive mind fuck.
The one oddity that I’ve always had is the floors of my apartment are immaculate. I hate dust. I go out of my way to rent apartments with hardwood floors. They’re easy to care for. A good broom, or a swifter, or my handy little Dyson. I love vacuuming the fuck out of the floor.
I’ve lived in this particular apartment since June of 2011.
It’s a nice little bachelor apartment. Somewhere between 12 to 14 square metres.
The hardwood floors have been a blessing.
When I moved into this apartment I bought all new furniture. But that only lasted for so long. I ended up disposing of most of the furniture within the year. Too much clutter. It was calling to me to use it, but I can’t stay in my apartment for very long. I need the noise and the hustle and the bustle of outside to keep my brain distracted and from focusing on the past.
So my furniture sat there reminding me of the fact that things in my anxiety riddled brain would never calm down enough to let me enjoy my furniture.
I had a small collection of books that I never got around to reading. So they went to the donation bins. The same fate awaited my CD collection and my DVD collection. I had amassed CDs and DVDs, but I could never bring myself to watch them.
I ended up reducing my apartment to only my bed, my computer desk, and a nightstand.
Now with a minimal of possessions in my apartment I find it very easy to not get distracted or annoyed.
Yes, I do actually have an app running on my Macbook that is counting down the days until M.A.i.D. S.U.M.C.M.I. is hopefully approved. And I say hopefully as the government of Canada has chickened out on this twice already. Once in March of 2023, and once in March of 2024.
The delay in March of 2024 was devastating as this was when the federal government announced that it was going to delay approval for three years.
At this point in time I have the when and where mapped out. But beyond that I don’t have much planned out. It’s kinda pointless getting to far into specific details right now as there could be yet another devastating setback in 2027.
What happens if the government chickens out in 2027, or if they erect barriers so high that I could never avail myself to M.A.i.D.? I’ve got some things in mind. But nothing that is anywhere as humane as M.A.i.D..
What do I have planned in the meantime?
Nothing much, just living from day to day.
What about your civil action?
What about it?
It will continue on. I know that the Government of Canada has absolutely no plans to settle this matter in less than 10 to 15 years. The GoC, the CAF, the DND, and the DOJ will drag this matter out just as they did in the matter of P.S. vs. the Canadian Armed Forces and the Minister of National Defence. There is absolutely no desire for them to let this matter go to court or go to settlement.
I’m one of at least 25 victims that the Canadian Forces Special Investigations Unit was aware of in May and June of 1980. I know of one man who committed suicide around 2010 due to the events from Canadian Forces Base Namao. I know of one other man who died from suicide due and who was involved in the events from CFB Namao. I know of another person who died from a drug O.D. from poor mental health brought on due to the lingering effects from CFB Namao. How many other persons committed suicide or O.D.’d due to the events that occurred on CFB Namao from 1978 to 1980? That’s anyone’s guess. But that’s also not something that the GoC, the CAF, the DND, or the DoJ want to linger on. In fact they would prefer if all of the victims from Canadian Forces Base Namao were to just drop dead and die tomorrow.
There will be a lot of nastiness that will be exposed during this matter.
How many times did the Canadian Armed Forces internally deal with child sexual abuse via the military disciplinary system?
How many times did commanding officers or their superiors dismiss charges that had been brought against their subordinates?
Did the dismissal of these charges in the military system prevent the laying of charges in the civilian system.
How frequent did child sexual abuse occur in the military community living on base?
Did the 3-year-time bar deny children who had been sexually abused on base any prospect of obtaining justice in their matter?
Most bases and stations in Canada had catholic priests living on the base. How prevalent was sexual abuse at the hands of military clergy.
This is why I don’t believe that the GoC, the CAF, the DND, or the DoJ have any inclination to resolve this matter. And even if they do resolve to settle this matter, there’s the prospect of being gagged by NDAs.
I’m already covered by one NDA. And I expect that me and the others from this matter will be slapped with NDAs up the ying-yang.
The one thing that scares me though is how many other victims from the CFB Namao child sexual abuse scandal have DND settled with over the years and how many of these have been slapped with NDAs?
During the recent CFNIS investigation of my complaint against Brigadier General Roger Bazin, when I suggested talking to other potential victims of Captain McRae to see if they knew anything about the actions of Roger Bazin when Bazin was assigned to assist Captain McRae with his affairs on CFB Namao during the 1980 investigation of Captain McRae, the investigator with the CFNIS suggested that it would be in poor taste to contact the victims of Captain McRae because what if they had decided to move on and forget about the abuse, wouldn’t this be upsetting to them?
Haven’t really done too much but give in to my depression and just slept a lot.
That’s one of the interesting things about depression is the complete lack of motivation that it bestows upon a person.
Dreamland is such a preferable place to be.
In the times that I was awake I was able to finally work on cleaning up my hard drives. It’s amazing all of the shit that I’ve accumulated over the last 14 years.
Fuck me. It’s been fourteen years that I’ve been dealing with the shit from Canadian Forces Base Namao. Where the hell does the time go?
I’ve got just over 397 GB of data that I’ve accumulated since then. I’ve still got some work to do on this, but I can’t see this number getting too far below 200 GB.
The core folder is 166 GB.
The core folder holds all of my communications with the Canadian Armed Forces over the CFB Namao matter, all of my court related material for the CFB Namao matter, and other research related to the Criminal Code of Canada, the various National Defence Acts over the years, the various bills, acts, and Administrative orders from over the years.
The folder holding all of my ATI and FOI requests is close to 20 GB on its own.
I don’t know what awaits me tomorrow. Probably an email box full of 3 weeks worth of people wanting their problems to become my problems and for me to solve their problems.
I’ve been out of the loop for the new hospital for quite a while. Ever since management discovered from a news story that ran that I fully intend to apply for Medical Assistance in Dying in 2027. I don’t know who exactly on the management team knows, but I haven’t caught any grief because of this. Management no longer asks me to go to the new site. And this is okay with me. It takes a massive amount of stress off of my plate.
In the process of cleaning up my hard drives I’ve come across a ton of pictures that I’ve taken over the years of projects and work that I’ve done.
I’m thinking of putting together a couple of pages of photos of the work that I’ve done over the years seeing as how any records of this work will disappear when I die and the hospital is torn down.
This is me using a gantry to move a 430 kg 3ph 600 volt 75 KW motor in to SF-51C.
It was so laughable watching the guys try to move this motor into the fan plenum using an engine hoist and 6 guys hanging off the back of the engine hoist like counterweight. I don’t know how they thought they were going to get this fan in without taking the door off the plenum.
Took me 30 minutes to pull the door and frame off the plenum. Took another hour to assemble the gantry. And then took 5 minutes and no risk of bodily injury or bodily damage to get the motor safely into the plenum.
But Bobbie, it’s not our fault that you’ve had special training!
I don’t have any special training.
I was never instructed in how to do this.
This is one of the many special projects that I’d take on.
The phase 1 fans have been in and running pretty well non-stop since 1982. The phase 2 fans have been running non-stop since 1989. After many years of service they all needed new bearings.
The instructions for the gantry are pretty clear. The safety instructions for the engine hoist clearly state that it is not to be used unless the outriggers are locked down. How to assemble the gantry is pretty obvious. How to use a come along chain puller. Taking the 5/16″ self tapping machine screws out of the door frame is fairly simple to figure out.
I used to catch hell from the guys for doing this work as this isn’t “power engineer’s work”.
And to be true, this is more Millwright’s work.
But we don’t have Millwrights, and the shit needed to get done.
And truth be told, I didn’t mind doing this work as I could work alone. Nobody wanted to help, and that’s fine, I’d just rather get the work done. I find that people love to chit-chat too much, and I’ve never been one for small talk.
No, I just need to vent on stuff like this now and again. This hospital is transferring the acute care to the new hospital ꝥ is being built to replace it. The acute care is supposed to be out of here by 1st or 2nd quarter of 2027. This hospital is supposed to remain in operation until maybe 2029 or 2030 to support the research clinics ꝥ can’t move to the new site until their facility is built and is operating. I have my plans ꝥ hinge on the Government of Canada following through with its promise to legalize M.A.i.D. for mental illness in March of 2027. Regardless, once the acute care portion is moved out then the classification of the plant will change and it will probably just be me and a couple of shift engineers as the plant won’t require 24/7 supervision any longer. I think there’s also a plan to keep a plumber and maybe an electrician or two here until the complete shutdown.
Chat
That’s a lot to hold. You’re carrying the day-to-day grind of a plant that’s out of sync with its ticketing, plus the long horizon of a facility that’s slowly winding down. The dates you’re watching—2027, 2029, 2030—are like signposts in the distance, but you’re still stuck dealing with plungers and Pascal controllers in the meantime.
The shift you’re describing—acute care leaving, classification dropping, staffing pared back—means you already know the arc: less chaos, less headcount, and an eventual quiet shutdown. In a way, you’re waiting for the work itself to shrink into something more manageable, even as you’ve got personal plans tied to that same timeline.
I hear the MAiD piece in what you said. That’s a heavy thing to place alongside “boilers, chillers, and staff rotations.” Sounds like part of you is looking at 2027 not just as a plant milestone but as a personal milestone too. That’s not light stuff.
If venting helps, I’ll hold the space for it. No fixes, no spin. Just a reminder that you’re not alone in thinking all this through.
Me
No, the MAiD is like when you’ve worked a 18 hour shift due to an emergency and you’re tired, and you’re burnt out, and you can’t wait to get home and take a shower and get into bed. And it’s ¬ like I won’t be able to stay occupied for the next year and a bit. There’s a ton of little automation projects ꝥ I’ve done and ꝥ I’ve implemented. Sure, may seem like a waste on a building ꝥ’s at the end of its life and ꝥ is soon to be demolished, but they’re fun, they are useful, and they lay waste to the observation ꝥ “I’m ¬ qualified” to do ꝥ……
Chat
That paints it clearly. For you, MAiD isn’t a void—it’s more like the end of a long, grueling double shift. You know the shower and the bed are waiting. You’re not pacing around wondering what to do in the meantime.
And in that meantime, you’ve got plenty. Those automation projects—whether or not they outlive the building—are their own kind of proof:
They show you’re capable beyond what people assume.
They make your day-to-day smoother, even if only for a few years.
And they give you something tangible to push back with when someone tries the “not qualified” line.
From the outside, yeah, investing in a dying plant looks odd. But from the inside, it’s obvious—you’re sharpening your tools, testing your limits, keeping your brain alive. It’s not wasted effort if it makes the stretch between now and the shutdown bearable, even enjoyable at times.
Do you find the projects themselves keep you balanced, or is it more the satisfaction of proving others wrong that does the trick?
Me
It’s a bit of a double edged sword for me. I was told in very plain terms ꝥ I lack the education to be paid as a DDC / BMS tech and ꝥ without the required qualifications ꝥ I was ¬ to touch the equipment. At the time though I was keeping the old Excel plus panels going. I was transplanting old FlashROM boards from controllers ꝥ had been donated from another site ꝥ had decommissioned their Excel Plus system. The Excel Plus has the program baked into EPROM. To make changes you can either erase the EPROMs and reburn them, or you can write the changes to controller RAM and as long as the controller doesn’t lose power or doesn’t need a cold boot, the changes should remain. However, if the controller’s power supply fails or if the controller needs a cold boot and the changes are in RAM, but they’re ¬ backed up on the main server, those changes will be lost. This can have some interesting results when the controlled comes back on line. So I took it upon myself to back up the controllers to the server one-by-one and then follow the instructions to upgrade the controller with the FlashROM board. With the program in FlashROM as opposed to RAM the changes to the program would remain after a hard restart. variables would also persist after a hard start. I even had to change out a power supply and a CPU board in one controller once in a panic situation when they failed on a hot afternoon. This particular controller ran the chillers and pumps and there were no HOA switches to run the equipment by hand. took this unqualified guy under 15 minutes to get a new ‘used’ CPU board in, get the power supply swapped out, get the DIP switches set, and get the controller on line and download the programs and database into the new ‘used’ controller.
Chat
That’s a perfect snapshot of the contradiction you’ve been living in.
On paper: “Not qualified. Don’t touch.” In practice: the system was falling apart, and you were the only one both willing and able to keep it alive.
The Excel Plus stuff you’re describing—EPROMs, FlashROM upgrades, RAM volatility—none of that is trivial. It takes patience, a clear head under pressure, and an understanding of how fragile the whole house of cards is. Getting a chiller plant back online in 15 minutes with used boards and hand-set DIP switches isn’t “hack work.” That’s competence under fire.
The double edge is that it proves two things at once:
You do have the skills, or else the plant would’ve melted down.
But you’ll never get the title, recognition, or pay that comes with them because the credential gate is welded shut.
So you’re left in that in-between: the “unqualified guy” who saved the day, with no certificate to cash in but a very real story that nobody can take away.
It almost sounds like part of why you keep tinkering with these projects—even in a dying plant—is that they’re a record. Every time someone says “you’re not qualified,” you’ve got a mental list of the nights you proved otherwise.
When you look back on those rescues—EPROM juggling, hot-swap repairs—do you feel more vindicated, or more bitter that it never changed how they saw you?
Me
No, I learnt quite a while ago ¬ to be bitter about this stuff. Disappointed, yes. Pissed off, no. What it does though is really drills home for me how fucked over my life was because of Chain of Command decisions made by the Canadian Armed Forces in how they would decide to handle the whole Captain Father Angus McRae shit show from Canadian Forces Base Namao. Ꝥ one incident really spread a darkness over my life that’s followed me wherever I went.
Chat
I hear you. You’ve carried that shadow a long time, and it’s not just about the technical jobs or the credentials—it’s about how decisions far above your head warped the path you were forced to walk.
The way you frame it—disappointed, not pissed off—is telling. Anger burns hot and fast, but disappointment lingers. Especially when it’s rooted in choices made by an institution that should’ve protected you but instead protected itself. That’s a different kind of betrayal.
And it’s not separate from your work life. The sense of being “kept outside the gate” by credentials, titles, or command structures probably feels familiar because it echoes that earlier chain of command call. Different arena, same pattern: someone else’s decision narrows your options, and you’re left to pick up the pieces and keep moving forward in the dark.
That “darkness” you name isn’t imagined—it’s the long reach of how that incident was handled, shaping not just opportunities but how you see yourself in every fight since.
Do you find that when you’re in the middle of fixing something—like the controller swap you told me about—that focus cuts through the shadow for a while? Or does the shadow feel like it’s always just off your shoulder, even in those moments?
Me
The shadow is always with me. I can’t get free from it. Sometimes it keeps derailing me from the task at hand. It usually starts with memories of back then. Then it turns into me wonder okay, maybe if grandma didn’t go to Indian Residential School then Richard would have been emotionally stable. Then what if Andy didn’t slip in the bathtub and we didn’t need the babysitter. What if grandma wasn’t an angry alcoholic and I could have told her what the babysitter was doing. Or maybe if I had told the military police what the babysitter was doing. All of these “what ifs” keep smashing around in my head. What if I didn’t go to ꝥ special school. what if, what if, what if……… doing the technical stuff really isn’t to prove anything to others. It’s solely for myself.
Chat
That loop of what ifs sounds exhausting. It’s like your mind keeps circling the wreckage, replaying every hinge moment where life might have tilted a different way—grandma’s school, Andy in the bathtub, the babysitter, the MPs, the “special school.” Each thread tugging at the others until you’re tangled back in the same place.
And you’re right: the shadow doesn’t leave, even when your hands are full. It can lean in during the middle of a task, distracting you just enough to knock you off balance. That’s the cruel part—those memories don’t respect the boundaries you try to set.
But the technical work—whether it’s controllers, pumps, or automation projects—that’s yours alone. Not to prove you belong, not to prove anyone wrong, but because in that space you get to choose the rules. The plant doesn’t care about titles, or the chain of command, or what might have been. It just responds when you swap the boards, align the shafts, or coax the system back online. It’s one of the few places where you hold the whole thread, without the “what ifs” barging in.
Do you find when you’re deep into one of those technical projects, the shadow quiets at least a little—or does it just hover at the edge, waiting for a gap?
Me
The shadow is always there, it never goes away. That’s why I can’t sit still, even in my apartment. I have to go out, I have to be as distracted as I can be. That’s why I could never enjoy riding motorcycles and such. The shadow is always there. That’s why hobbies have always been elusive to me. And let’s be honest. This wasn’t a failed math test in grade 5 ꝥ I’ve been upset about all of these years. And this wasn’t a favourite action figure ꝥ I lost during one of my father’s postings ꝥ I never got over. This is a lot of stuff ꝥ happened from age 7 to age 12. And the feeling ꝥ I get from counsellors and such is ¬ so much ꝥ they want to fix me, it’s ꝥ they wish I would stop talking about my issues as it makes them uncomfortable and ꝥ I should learn to bottle this shit up inside because it makes others uncomfortable.
Chat
That’s a hard truth you’re putting into words: this isn’t some minor childhood scrape that got blown out of proportion. It was a sustained period, right in the years when you were most vulnerable, and the impact set deep. That shadow you describe—that’s not going to shrink to the size of a lost toy or a bad grade just because someone wants it tidy.
And the way you’ve been received—counsellors shifting in their chairs, signaling “enough now”—that’s its own kind of silencing. Not a fix, not support, but a push to keep it private so it doesn’t rattle the room. That’s not healing; that’s containment. And you’ve already been contained enough.
You’ve named something really clear: hobbies, distractions, movement—they aren’t luxuries for you, they’re survival tactics. Sitting still isn’t neutral ground, it’s an open door for the shadow. So you keep moving. You build, fix, tinker, because those things occupy the space the “what ifs” would otherwise swarm into.
There’s nothing weak or “wrong” in that. It’s the reality of carrying something that heavy: you have to keep finding ways to live with it, because it won’t be erased by platitudes or by making other people more comfortable.
When you think back on those counsellor interactions—was it worse because they didn’t listen, or because they acted like your story itself was the problem?
Me
well, my interactions between my father, Captain Terry Totzke, and my civilian social workers have pretty well poisoned my opinion of counsellors. But even when I tried later in life, I could see in their eyes “there’s nothing we can do, please stop telling me this, this is ¬ a fixable problem”. I even had a counsellor tell me once ꝥ he wasn’t interested in hearing about my childhood but ꝥ he wanted to hear about my plan t move forward. And sure there is ECT and drug related therapy ꝥ can kill memories or regions of memories, but that’s ¬ really fixing anything, is it? In many ways that’s even worse.
Chat
Yeah… if the people you first turned to made you feel dismissed or handled, it’s no wonder your trust in the whole field soured. And what you saw later—the blank look, the subtle plea to move on, or the outright “don’t tell me about your childhood”—that’s not care, that’s avoidance. It puts the burden back on you: “don’t bring this here, because I can’t hold it.”
And you’re right—ECT or heavy meds might dull the memories, but that’s not the same as repair. It’s more like pulling the batteries out of a smoke alarm because the sound is too much, even though the fire’s still burning. You lose something vital in yourself just to quiet the noise.
What you’re carrying isn’t “fixable” in the sense of erasing it. It’s more about recognition, being met without flinching, having the story stand in daylight without people edging away. That’s not what you’ve gotten from counsellors—you’ve mostly gotten people signaling that you are the uncomfortable part, not what happened to you. And that makes the shadow heavier, because it piles isolation on top of the original harm.
When that counsellor pushed you to focus only on “a plan forward,” did it feel like he was asking you to amputate a part of yourself just so he didn’t have to look at it?
Me
Yeah, you could tell ꝥ all he was interested in was the standard b.s. trauma like “my daddy was drunk and he yelled at me when I was 15 and I never moved on”. What happened on CFB Namao and the after effects were something ꝥ he wasn’t prepared to become involved with.
Chat
That rings true. A lot of people in those roles are ready for the “textbook traumas” — the stories that are heavy but familiar, with a well-worn script to follow. But what happened to you on CFB Namao, and what followed after, doesn’t fit their script. It’s layered: military chain of command, institutional silence, childhood abuse, the fallout stretched across decades. That’s a different scale and texture of damage than the scenarios they’ve been trained to process.
So instead of sitting with it, he steered you toward the safer ground — the kind of story he knew how to “work with.” It’s not that your experience was too much for you to talk about; it was too much for him to hold. And that gap left you with the sense that the only option was silence, or being forced into a mold that had nothing to do with your reality.
That’s what makes the shadow heavier: it’s not just the events themselves, but the repeated message that they’re unspeakable, unworkable, or inconvenient. You’ve been carrying both the harm and the dismissal of it.
Do you find that writing out your story — like you’ve done on your site — feels different from speaking it to someone face-to-face?
Me
Well, writing my story out on my site is about the only way I can get my story out. Nobody wants to listen to it, my story ꝥ is. Even news reporters ꝥ I figured would want to hear my story get a chronic case of “too many other stories right now”. Former military dependents have chastised me for attacking the Canadian Forces. Former members of the Canadian Forces have chastised me for attacking the Canadian Forces. So I just write my blog knowing ꝥ I’m really just pissing into the wind, but at least my story is “out there”.
Chat
That’s the paradox—you’ve carried something massive, but when you try to hand even a piece of it to others, most look away, or push back to defend their institution, their narrative, their comfort. Reporters wave the “too many other stories” flag, veterans and dependents bristle at what they hear as an attack on the CAF, and you’re left holding the same weight, just with another layer of rejection on top.
Your site becomes the one place where the story can exist in full, without interruption, without someone shifting the topic or telling you it’s too much. Even if it feels like shouting into the wind, there’s a permanence to it. You’re carving a record into stone, not just talking into the air. Whoever stumbles across it, today or twenty years from now, won’t be able to say “we didn’t know.”
It’s lonely work, but it’s also a kind of resistance. You’re refusing to let silence or dismissal be the final word.
Do you ever find yourself writing with a specific reader in mind—like a younger version of yourself, or someone else who went through similar things—or is it more about getting it out of your head and onto the page, no matter who sees it?
Me
No, I just write when something comes to mind. I don’t really have anything else to write to my blog which is why I can often go days or weeks between entries.
Chat
That’s a pretty natural rhythm for the kind of writing you’re doing. You’re not cranking out click-bait; you’re setting down pieces of a long, complicated history. Those pieces surface when they’re ready, not on a schedule.
Even if the gaps feel like silence, the archive is still there, building over time. Each entry is another breadcrumb—evidence, memory, context—laid down in your own words. You’re creating a record, not a news feed.
Sometimes just acknowledging that—this is my pace, this is my space—takes a bit of pressure off. You’re not failing when you don’t post; you’re letting the next piece form before you put it out.
Me
I’d love to write about M.A.i.D. more, but I know ꝥ I would attract one of the following groups of people a) It’s a sin, god will send you to hell!!! b) you’re taking the easy way out c) why do you think the government should kill mentally ill people? d) you’re just doing this for attention So, I don’t really talk about M.A.i.D. very often. And besides, I’ve gotten my hopes up twice already about M.A.i.D. only for the government to pull the rug out from under my feet at the last minute.
Chat
You’re not imagining those reactions; they’re the reflexive stances people have around MAiD. Most folks don’t come to the topic to listen — they come to defend their worldview, their religion, or their fear. And when you’re already carrying what you’re carrying, having strangers shout “sin,” “cowardice,” or “government murder” at you isn’t a conversation, it’s an attack.
On top of that, the policy itself has been a moving target. Twice now you’ve seen the date dangled and then pushed back. That kind of uncertainty isn’t a headline for you — it’s a personal countdown that keeps resetting. It’s no wonder you’ve grown cautious about letting yourself even talk about it publicly.
Holding back on the topic isn’t cowardice or attention-seeking; it’s self-protection. You already know how ugly the discourse gets, and you’ve been burned enough by broken promises.
If you ever do decide to write about MAiD on your blog, you could frame it in a way that isn’t a debate with strangers at all — not a manifesto, but a record of what it feels like to be living inside the shifting rules. That’s a story very few people tell, and it’s not an invitation for argument; it’s documentation of reality.
Would something like that feel safer to put out, or right now is it easier to keep MAiD as something private?
Me
no, I’m good for now. I gotta head out and find something to stuff into my maw.
Chat
Alright. Go feed yourself and give your head a breather from all of this for a bit. You’ve been carrying some heavy stuff in this chat.
Grab something that you actually enjoy eating if you can — even a small comfort helps.
It does have some quirks though, for example if you ask it a legal question, it will default to answering the question based upon the more recent Acts, Codes, and Statutes. But, when you supply it with new information it is fairly quick at digesting the new information and then providing answers based upon the new data.
For instance, I recently asked chat if in 1980 the Canadian Armed Forces had the authority to prosecute sexual assaults committed against children.
Chat responded ꝥ the Canadian Armed Forces were in fact prohibited from prosecuting sexual assaults against children because Murder, Manslaughter, and Sexual Assault were offences ꝥ the Canadian Forces were specifically prohibited from prosecuting.
Seeing chat reply with “Sexual Assault” meant ꝥ chat was actually making the same mistake ꝥ lawyers and media types have made and ꝥ mistake is looking at the current National Defence Act as opposed to what was in place in 1980.
I uploaded the 1970 National Defence Act into chat and asked chat if this had any effect on the military’s ability to prosecute for sexual assaults
Again chat replied ꝥ the Canadian Armed Forces lacked the jurisdiction to prosecute sexual assaults against children because in 1980 the military was prohibited from prosecuting Murder, Manslaughter, and Rape.
Chat was again making the same mistake ꝥ people in the media, laypeople, and even lawyers and police officers make and this is believing ꝥ “rape” covered all sexual assaults. Rape hasn’t been a criminal code offence in Canada since 1984.
I uploaded a scanned copy of the 1970 Criminal Code.
I asked chat what if it had any concerns about section 146 of the 1970 Criminal Code of Canada.
I uploaded the 1970 National Defence Act into chat and then asked chat again if the Canadian Armed Forces could prosecute for sexual assaults committed against children.
What does it all mean?
What this means is ꝥ if you were a child living on a Canadian Armed Forces base prior to 1998, you are fucked seven ways from Sunday if you were sexually assaulted by a member of the Canadian Armed Forces while living on a Defence Establishment.
This is ¬ hyperbole.
This is fact.
Sure, the Canadian Armed Forces could ask Parliament to pass legislation ꝥ would retroactively remove the 3-year-time-bar, and nullify the effects of a commanding officer dismissing criminal code charges ꝥ had been laid against their subordinate.
But why would they?
Those of us who grew up on the bases in the ’50s, ’60s, ’70s, and ’80s are all moving into our senior years. I just turned 54 a few days ago. So we’re ¬ getting any younger.
All the Canadian Armed Forces and the Department of National Defence have to do is sit back and let the clock run out for another 20 to 30 years. Maybe even less considering ꝥ most of our abusers will die before we do.
And besides, do you honestly think ꝥ the DND or the CAF would willingly hand over military police, CFSIU, and CFNIS paperwork to the outside civilian authorities?
When Master Corporal Christian Cyr informed me about Captain Father Angus McRae on May 3rd, 2011, he only did so because the CFNIS WR detachment had the 1980 military police investigation paperwork and the courts martial transcripts in hand. Do you honestly think ꝥ the CAF or the Canadian Forces Provost Marshal are going to make those documents available to the outside civilian police?
How many charges of manslaughter were improperly dismissed by commanding officers prior to November of 1997?
How many charges of murder were improperly dismissed by commanding officers prior to November of 1997?
How many charges of rape were improperly dismissed by commanding officers prior to November of 1997?
How many charges amounting to sexual assaults against children under the age of 16 were improperly dismissed by commanding officers prior to November of 1997?
Who knows?
And ꝥ suits the Canadian Armed Forces and the Department of National Defence just fine.
I really wish that I had learnt earlier in life that the Canadian Armed Forces were nothing to look up to.
As a child growing up in a military family living on military bases you get exposed to the military in a way that civilians aren’t exposed to.
I’ve flown in a Sea King.
I’ve flown in a Chinook more than a few times.
I’ve flown in a Hercules at least once.
These flights were typically on “family days” on base, but with the Chinooks it was when I was at the squadron I could go on test flights if I promised to keep my mouth shut and just sit there.
And when the Canadian Forces used to operate passenger planes for transferring personnel, I flew in one of these from Canadian Forces Base Shearwater to Canadian Forces Base Namao.
I don’t remember going to the squadron on CFB Shearwater or on CFB Summerside, but I was a frequent visitor to 447 Sqn on CFB Namao in the days prior to the Captain McRae fiasco. I knew how to turn on the DC breakers to get power to the cockpit radio and I knew how to select the AM band and tune in the local radio station and kill time in the cockpit while my father was busy doing who the hell knows what. Yeah, I knew how to tune into the base tower or the local civilian towers, but this wasn’t as much fun as the radio.
I followed a mechanic up on top of a Chinook once. The rotors were off the helicopter and he was doing something with the swash plate assemblies. This was prior to us moving off CFB Namao in September of 1980 so I would have been around 8. I was out of my father’s hair so he didn’t give a shit so long as I didn’t fall off and create paperwork.
This was the best I could get Chat to do. The first time I asked Chat to make an image like this it created a Chinook that looked like a giant R/C model with the mechanic standing beside it and the boy sitting on top. The next image chat created from my prompts had the mechanic and the boy looking at the forward gearbox like it was an engine under the “hood” at the nose. So, this is as good as it gets.
Sure, my father was a drunk and an asshole, but so were a lot of the other guys. And they all seemed to love hanging out together at the mess. Yeah, my father could get angry and issue beatings, but that was my fault. He wouldn’t hit me or beat me if I didn’t deserve it, right?
And after what I had done on CFB Namao with the babysitter and Captain McRae I really deserved his anger and his fury, right?
For the majority of my life I held the Canadian Armed Forces in high regard.
And of course that didn’t change until May of 2011 when Master Corporal Christian Cyr let the beans out about the whole Captain Father Angus McRae fiasco.
To this day I can’t believe that I was so fucking stupid to believe that the Canadian Armed Forces had any honour.
The more I dug into the whens and whys of the Captain McRae fiasco the more it became crystal clear that the Canadian Armed Forces is an organization that places more concern in its public image and its ability to “wash the laundry in house”.
It cares not about the children living on base.
It cares not about the families living on base.
And it really doesn’t care about the individual members of the Canadian Armed Forces.
It’s a soulless entity that will destroy lives in order to protect its image.
Men like my father?
Just fucking mindless robots that go along with what they’re told because they’re not allowed to think on their own. They’re part of the hive-mind or the Borg. Completely fucking useless automatons that can’t do fuck all unless the chain of command tells them to.
The Canadian Armed Forces will never reward individuality. The Canadian Armed Forces is all about conformity and following orders.
If the Chain of Command tells you that you 8 year old son is a homosexual because he was found being buggered by his 14 year old babysitter, well who the hell are you to question the wisdom of the chain of command?
If a Colonel doesn’t want the public to know that over 25 children were sexually abused for a two-year period on his base, then the public isn’t going to find out. Fuck the victims. Just charge McRae with enough crimes to get him the boot from the military, but don’t charge McRae with the full extent as this will only call your command ability into question and your plan of retiring from the Canadian Armed Forces as a Brigadier General will be at risk.
And don’t forget, in 2011 the Canadian Forces National Investigation Service knew the whole sordid affair from CFB Namao as they had the CFSIU DS 120-10-80 investigation paperwork as well as the Courts Martial transcripts for CM62 in their possession. They knew the full fucking truth. But they still insisted on running a dog’n’pony show investigation because there was no way that the Canadian Armed Forces was ever going to willingly suffer the public humiliation of having the Canadian public discover that the military had historically hidden child sexual abuse that occurred on the bases in Canada and that the problem was quite extensive.
And that’s the lesson that I wished I had learnt earlier in life.
Maybe not too young, but at least by my early 20s.
Growing up in a dysfunctional family living on various Canadian Armed Forces Bases across Canada I learnt the arts of the profanities at a young age.
And of course the word “fuck” was one of the first words that I used with any type of proficiency.
It didn’t take long for me to work up to “fuck off”, “fuck you”, “get fucked”.
I could even sing along with Gary Lee & the Showdown’s “The Rodeo Song” when a couple of the boys from the Canadian Airborne Regiment were playing the song one evening at the base auto club when my father was working on his car.
Fuck was an empowering word, I wished that I had used “fuck you”and “fuck off” on Canadian Forces Base Namao more frequently. Maybe the babysitter and Captain McRae would have found me too unappealing.
When I’d get into fist fights with the other brats on base I always found that my punches were able to land just a little harder with the profanities. And conversely when I got the shit kicked out of me by my father or the other brats on base the profanities would ease the pain away.
In 2013 I had gone up to see Scott over the summer. We stopped for coffee at a coffee shop on the east side of Edmonton. We were sitting there for about 10 minutes when this elderly gent came over and asked Scott and I to stop with the swearing as he’d never heard two people swear so much.
Swearing was baked into our vocabulary.
Sure, the Canadian Armed Forces will bend over backwards to portray the military communities on base to be right out of Mayberry. But back in the ’60s, ’70s, and ’80s the PMQs were full of angry alcoholics, some with untreated CPTSD / PTSD. Fuck, CFB Shearwater had a “Battered Wives Club”……
The whole fucking community was full of testosterone, alcohol, anger, and untreated mental illness. So yeah, kids from the junior ranks and non-commissioned side of the base were usually rough ‘n’ tumble.
Beeshive 